After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 724959 - Icons on "All Applications" displayed far to small on 7" Display
Icons on "All Applications" displayed far to small on 7" Display
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: gnome-shell
Classification: Core
Component: general
3.10.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-shell-maint
gnome-shell-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2014-02-22 17:43 UTC by Ruben Kelevra
Modified: 2021-07-05 14:35 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Appearance at 2560x1440 / scale-factor=2 (578.34 KB, image/jpeg)
2014-03-05 16:16 UTC, Owen Taylor
Details

Description Ruben Kelevra 2014-02-22 17:43:38 UTC
Screenshot on an 7" (primary) display
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-22349470/Bildschirmfoto-von---2014-02-22-18-11-15--.png.html

Same installation on an 19" (primary) display
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-22349469/Bildschirmfoto-von---2014-02-22-18-07-10--.png.html



7" Display:
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-22349522/Bildschirmfoto-von---2014-02-22-18-11-28--.png.html
19" Display: 
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-22349503/Bildschirmfoto-von---2014-02-22-18-07-31--.png.html

Distribution: Arch Linux (lastest updates installed.)

# pacman -Qi mutter
Name    : mutter
Version : 3.10.4-1

This version does not appear some (or one) version ago from mutter.
Comment 1 Ruben Kelevra 2014-02-22 17:57:01 UTC
Using the 19" monitor for boot&login, plug-in the 7", plug-off the 19" one, starting gnome-tweak-tool, selecting another scale-factor, switching back to 1.0 solves the problem here:

http://www.pic-upload.de/view-22349889/Bildschirmfoto-von---2014-02-22-18-56-31--.png.html
Comment 2 Owen Taylor 2014-03-05 16:13:05 UTC
Suspect the problem here is that we doubled padding with the scale factor, and that made the calculations in the overview fall apart.

I think using a scale factor of 2 on a 1360x768 display is not right, no matter how small it is, because (not just for this bug), GNOME is simply not going to work well on a 680x384 display. We probably should require some number of pixels of vertical resolution in addition to hi-dpi - Either 1080 or 1200 probably.

Can you file a bug against gnome-settings-daemon to that effect if one doesn't already exist?

That being said, we also should investigate this bug, and try to do better about the ratio of padding to icons when there is limited space - it doesn't even look particularly great on my 2560x1440 display.
Comment 3 Owen Taylor 2014-03-05 16:16:40 UTC
Created attachment 271006 [details]
Appearance at 2560x1440 / scale-factor=2
Comment 4 GNOME Infrastructure Team 2021-07-05 14:35:39 UTC
GNOME is going to shut down bugzilla.gnome.org in favor of  gitlab.gnome.org.
As part of that, we are mass-closing older open tickets in bugzilla.gnome.org
which have not seen updates for a longer time (resources are unfortunately
quite limited so not every ticket can get handled).

If you can still reproduce the situation described in this ticket in a recent
and supported software version, then please follow
  https://wiki.gnome.org/GettingInTouch/BugReportingGuidelines
and create a new ticket at
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/

Thank you for your understanding and your help.