After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 47594 - Installation segfaults without doing anything
Installation segfaults without doing anything
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] Installer
0.x.x [obsolete]
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Robey Pointer
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-03-08 23:03 UTC by cesarcardoso
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description cesarcardoso 2001-09-10 01:10:48 UTC
Installation segfaults after initial checks, so it does'n download anything.

* REPRODUCIBLE: Always

* STEPS TO REPRODUCE:

Only use the installer

* ACTUAL RESULTS: 

 The message

SEGV (11) -- SOMEBODY SET UP US THE BOMB.

appears

* EXPECTED RESULTS: 

  Install the CVS version :)

/tmp/eazel-install.log gives me the following:

 : Eazel-Installer v0.8.3 (build 07Mar01-1602)
 : Trying to contact Eazel Services...
d: Read category "Nautilus Hourly Build (Untested)"
d: it's exclusive.
 : --- installation round begins ---
 : Prepping install page
 : dep-check:FALSE install-categories:FALSE problems:FALSE successful:TRUE
d: first time through
d: -> let's go
d:    ... ready to install
d: eazel_install_install_packages (..., 1 cats, (null))
d: eazel_install_install_packages (upgrade = 1, downgrade = 1, force = 0)
d: -> install_packages_helper
d: do_dep_check tree
d: nautilus-suggested unfilled TOP no-id (UNKNOWN_STATUS/UNTOUCHED) 0x85d1440
d: package search url:
http://hourly.eazel.com:8888/catalog/find?name=nautilus-suggested&arch=i386&distro=RedHat70&protocol=http
d: (softcat db revision 28)
d: package info ok.
d: -> post_get_softcat_info 0x85d1440 nautilus-suggested
d: check_existing 0x85d1440 nautilus-suggested
d: versions are equal (0.8.3.0.200103070800), comparing minors
d: minors are EazelSourceSnapshot for new and EazelSourceSnapshot for installed)
d: nautilus-suggested-EazelSourceSnapshot version
0.8.3.0.200103070800-EazelSourceSnapshot already installed
d: <- post_get_softcat_info 0x85d1440 nautilus-suggested
d: Softcat check ok
d: (adding 0x85cd1e8 nautilus-trilobite a50510e59b6d33166875fae2ccbaa0ca to
dedupe)
d: (adding 0x85cd388 nautilus-mozilla ebc094467596e8dfb156fc3f357adf81 to
dedupe)
d: (adding 0x85cd528 nautilus-extras 41698f7bf49f4991aa2e49a733a66335 to dedupe)
d: (adding 0x85cd748 nautilus afa2c4c7a1f055a9e470187979b36053 to dedupe)
d: (adding 0x85cd8d0 mozilla-psm 7d84075f6378e67edb60fe6252cc03df to dedupe)
d: (adding 0x85d24e0 mozilla-mail c79cefcf85b48a9d77d108de0ad8f09d to dedupe)
d: nautilus-suggested of 7 Mar, 08:00 fill:TPDF TOP 18106
(ALREADY_INSTALLED/UNTOUCHED) 0x85d1440
d:   |-d- nautilus-trilobite v0.8.3.0.200103070800 unfilled 18107
(UNKNOWN_STATUS/UNTOUCHED) 0x85cd1e8
d:   |-d- nautilus-mozilla v0.8.3.0.200103070800 unfilled 18105
(UNKNOWN_STATUS/UNTOUCHED) 0x85cd388
d:   |-d- nautilus-extras v0.8.3.0.200103070800 unfilled 18103
(UNKNOWN_STATUS/UNTOUCHED) 0x85cd528
d:   |-d- nautilus v0.8.3.0.200103070800 unfilled 18101
(UNKNOWN_STATUS/UNTOUCHED) 0x85cd748
d:   |-d- mozilla-psm v0.8 unfilled 13978 (UNKNOWN_STATUS/UNTOUCHED) 0x85cd8d0
d:   \-d- mozilla-mail v0.8 unfilled 13977 (UNKNOWN_STATUS/UNTOUCHED) 0x85d24e0
d: post dep_check tree
d: nautilus-suggested of 7 Mar, 08:00 fill:TPDF TOP 18106
(ALREADY_INSTALLED/UNTOUCHED) 0x85d1440
d: entering subpruner 0x85d1440 nautilus-suggested ALREADY_INSTALLED
d: Package cancel status == 1
d: subpruner kill root 0x85d1440 nautilus-suggested because of 0x85d1440
nautilus-suggested
d: removing 0x85d1440 nautilus-suggested
 : INSTALL FAILED.
d: error handling begins: errant package nautilus-suggested of 7 Mar, 08:00
 : fail nautilus-suggested: nautilus-suggested of 7 Mar, 08:00 is already
installed
d: packages is empty after prune
d: -> no-two-packages conflict check begins (0 unique packages)
d: <- no_two_packages conflict
d: packages is empty after prune
d: -> file conflict check begins (0 unique packages)
d: <- file conflict check ends
d: --> do_requirement_consistency_check_internal
d: <-- do_requirement_consistency_check_internal
d: -> check_tree_for_conflicts
d: <- check_tree_for_conflicts
d: packages is empty after prune
d: -> check_feature_consistency begins, 0 packages
d: <- check_feature_consistency
d: POST-FEATURE-CHECK PACKAGE TREE
d: -> check_tree_for_conflicts
d: <- check_tree_for_conflicts
d: packages is empty after prune
d: FINAL TREE BEGIN
d: FINAL TREE END
d: <- install_packages_helper
d: 0 packages survived
w: Install failed
d: service->private->downloaded_files = (nil)
d: emit_done (result = FALSE)
d: Done, result is evil
d: ERROR : nautilus-suggested of 7 Mar, 08:00 is already installed
d: out of post_install



------- Additional Comments From robey-bugs@lag.net 2001-03-08 20:35:00 ----

looks like it went to the error page (nautilus is already installed) but crashed
then.  can you try a build from tonight?  cc:arik so he can push tonight's bits
to the visible webserver.




------- Additional Comments From robey-bugs@lag.net 2001-03-08 21:44:40 ----

this is similar to (and probably the same as) bug 47510 & bug 47574.

we think (after consulting with mjs) that it might an imlib-related bug.




------- Additional Comments From robey-bugs@lag.net 2001-03-08 22:31:58 ----

i'm sorry; i'm on crack.  ignore my last comment.




------- Additional Comments From robey-bugs@lag.net 2001-03-09 18:39:02 ----

i believe maciej's imlib patch may fix this.




------- Additional Comments From mjs@noisehavoc.org 2001-03-10 08:09:48 ----

Does anyone have any clue what to do to try to reproduce this? If the no-imlib
patch fixed this I'd like to get it off the radar.




------- Additional Comments From don@eazel.com 2001-03-10 15:30:20 ----

Agreed.




------- Additional Comments From cesarcardoso@ig.com.br 2001-03-10 15:45:05 ----

The new build of the installer looks solid and good. Maybe this bug should be
closed.



------- Additional Comments From robey-bugs@lag.net 2001-03-10 18:25:59 ----

fixed by maciej's magic "ditch imlib" patch...




------- Additional Comments From jonallen@sdf.lonestar.org 2001-03-11 13:40:40 ----

marking verified.  latest installer for rh7.0 doesn't crash.  eli: perhaps
someone can double-check rh6.2 for this behavior?



------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2001-09-09 21:10 -------

The original reporter (cesarcardoso@ig.com.br) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.