After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 206142 - Printing an addressbook (wishlist)
Printing an addressbook (wishlist)
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Contacts
3.2.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-addressbook-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 200223 202200 208825 243656 438292 556524 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-08-03 00:27 UTC by Adrian Custer
Modified: 2021-05-19 11:33 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Adrian Custer 2001-08-03 00:27:21 UTC
Hey everyone,

I'm using evo for all my email but I refuse to migrate to use the contact
list until it gains a fair amount of functionality. Addresses are pretty
sensitive and need a fair amount of flexibility to be useful. In this case,
I suggest some improvement that needs to happen to the printing of the
addesses. Ultimately this should act like a simple little database but in
the meantime some of this could be implemented.


Here is what I see as being really useful:


1) Better Selection:
-------------------

This would take some work to get flexible enough for my needs and would
require expanding the notion of Catagories from what exists now to allowing
multiple Fields such as "Type:" (e.g. Family, friend) (it's a bad name but
all that comes to mind at the momment) "Location" (e.g. East Coast, Bay
Area, Europe). Just having the list alphabetical means that I would have
all the list addresses interspersed with my "real" contacts.


2) Fields for inclusion:
------------------------

I might want to print out all the fiels or a very specific list, perhaps
just phone numbers or just emails but maybe:
       ****************************************************************
        FirstName       LastName                            phone
        thefirstline of the adddress
        theSecondline of the address
                     All_the_other_junk_I'll_never_use
                     but_want_to_have_on_hardcopy
     *******************************************************************

3) Print Format:
----------------

The coolest computer generated addressbooks are printed like old books were
 made so you can fold, say, ten sheets at once in a way that they can be
binded (stapled) on the bend and the redundant bends can be cut. This
leaves you with a smaller format book.




So the whole shebang would be an addressbook printed into a book that was
the size, for instance, a quarter of an 8 1/2 X 11 sheet. It would have my
family members printed first, follwed by friends ... and at the end would
have one page of just telephone numbers and one of email addresses. 

Thanks for the code,
cheers,
adrian
Comment 1 André Klapper 2004-06-21 21:22:51 UTC
*** bug 243656 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 André Klapper 2004-09-22 11:44:18 UTC
adding "printing" keyword to make printing issues searchable again,
finally...
sorry for the noise/spam.  :-/
Comment 3 André Klapper 2005-12-07 00:32:58 UTC
fixing a summary typo
Comment 4 Mike Hudson 2006-01-01 16:43:38 UTC
Below is a wishlist bug that I was going to submit, except that after a search I discovered this bug and it seems most relevant to add it here.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a request for an "old feature" - the old version of the contacts printout.

The contacts printout used to be a *wonderful* feature of evolution (circa 1 a year go - early 05). It had a nice compact style ...

Contacts printed out nice and short

Smith, John
Name: John Smith
Home: 555-1234
Home: 123 Main Street
Note: something something

And the font size was small, and spacing compact. Beautiful --- I could fit *37* contacts to a page, and had no trouble reading them.

With the more recent version of Evo (2 I think) it read

Smith, John
File As: Smith, John
Full Name: John Smith
Given Name: John
Family Name: Smith
Home Phone: 555-1234
Home Address: 123 Main Street
Categories: Personal
Note: something something

(Note that "John" and "Smith" each appear 3 times)

Now I down to 22 entries per page.

Now in the latest version (2.2.3), the font size is way is up and the lines appear to be double spaced ....

I now get only *7* entries per page ... my addressbook that used to fit in 5 pages now takes 28.

Two suggestions:
1) Configure which fields are printed
2) Configure spacing and fonts size.

Please please fix this - think of the trees ;)

(This is on Fedora Core 4.)
Comment 5 Devashish Sharma 2006-01-19 07:18:27 UTC
*** Bug 202200 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Devashish Sharma 2006-01-19 07:20:08 UTC
*** Bug 200223 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Devashish Sharma 2006-01-19 07:27:15 UTC
*** Bug 208825 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Devashish Sharma 2006-01-19 07:28:20 UTC
Consolidating all printing bugs.
Basically we need to support multiple print formats for addressbooks, like envelope etc. We also need to provide an option for printing to standard label sizes. Fields which are to be printed should also be configurable and also the spacing and font sizes.

Marking other printing bugs as duplicate of this one, so that we can track all printing issues in one place.
Comment 9 André Klapper 2006-02-22 00:14:55 UTC
reassigning bugs that were still assigned to clahey.
Comment 10 André Klapper 2007-05-15 20:44:32 UTC
*** Bug 438292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Matthieu Pupat 2007-11-12 16:13:28 UTC
Also I *really* think this should be consider as a bug not an enhancement and it should have a higher priority than Normal but it's just my opinion.
Comment 12 André Klapper 2012-02-27 11:39:51 UTC
*** Bug 556524 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 André Klapper 2021-05-19 11:33:24 UTC
GNOME is going to shut down bugzilla.gnome.org in favor of gitlab.gnome.org. 
As part of that, we are mass-closing older open tickets in bugzilla.gnome.org
which have not seen updates for a longer time (resources are unfortunately
quite limited so not every ticket can get handled).

If you can still reproduce the situation described in this ticket in a recent
and supported software version, then please follow
  https://wiki.gnome.org/Community/GettingInTouch/BugReportingGuidelines
and create a new enhancement request ticket at
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues/

Thank you for your understanding and your help.