After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 208825 - Feature Request: Addressbook printing to standard Avery label sizes.
Feature Request: Addressbook printing to standard Avery label sizes.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 206142
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Contacts
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: Future
Assigned To: evolution-addressbook-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-09-04 13:03 UTC by aaron
Modified: 2006-01-19 07:27 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description aaron 2001-09-04 13:03:54 UTC 
Feature Request: 
Addressbook printing to standard Avery label sizes.
See also bugs 6142 and 1058.
Comment 1 aaron 2001-09-26 11:50:32 UTC 
Setting keyword. This may actually be a gnome-print feature request,
in which case this can be closed as invalid or a duplicate of a
gnome-print bug over in bugzilla.gnome.org.
Comment 2 aaron 2003-12-11 16:03:27 UTC 
Axel from the evolution@ list writes:
I have just checked StarOfffice 7.0 (OpenOffice 1.1) and it supports
Evolution address books. Create data source of type address book with
sdbc:address:evolution. It worked out of the box. Very nice.

So, it should be relatively simple to import the labels into OOO and
print that way; is it worth it to have the feature right in Evolution?

This is tricky integration planning.
Comment 3 André Klapper 2004-09-22 11:41:32 UTC 
adding "printing" keyword to make printing issues searchable again, finally...
sorry for the noise/spam.  :-/
Comment 4 André Klapper 2004-09-22 11:42:23 UTC 
adding "printing" keyword to make printing issues searchable again, finally...
sorry for the noise/spam.  :-/
Comment 5 Devashish Sharma 2006-01-19 07:27:15 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 206142 ***