After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 140290 - GIMP tells me 1,000,000 times that it can't load font "MS Sans Serif 8" and will make do with "sans 8"
GIMP tells me 1,000,000 times that it can't load font "MS Sans Serif 8" and w...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 112401
Product: GIMP
Classification: Other
Component: General
2.0.x
Other Windows
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: GIMP Bugs
GIMP Bugs
: 140306 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-04-16 19:07 UTC by Shawn Boles
Modified: 2005-01-27 08:56 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Shawn Boles 2004-04-16 19:07:38 UTC
All I have to do is open The GIMP for Windows, and the Console pops up with 

** (gimp-2.0.exe:4294512909): WARNING **: Couldn't load font "MS Sans Serif 8"
falling back to "Sans 8"

And ever time I use a tool, open a menu, open a window, ANYTHING that uses the
GUI, the same error prints out about 10 times.  Is there any way to fix this?  I
am convinced that this is why The GIMP is slow on my computer!
Comment 1 Henrik Brix Andersen 2004-04-16 23:37:03 UTC
According to http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/gimp/faq.html this is a known
problem with the GTKWimp theme. Instructions on how to fix the problem is on
that page. Closing as NOTGNOME.
Comment 2 Sven Neumann 2004-09-13 10:20:39 UTC
*** Bug 140306 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Raphaël Quinet 2005-01-22 09:41:10 UTC
See also bug #112401.
Comment 4 weskaggs 2005-01-26 21:59:15 UTC
*** Bug 165334 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Raphaël Quinet 2005-01-27 08:56:25 UTC
Hmmm...  It would have been better to mark both this one and bug #165334 as
duplicates of bug #112401.  I don't know why I only added a reference in
comment #3 without marking this as a duplicate.  Probably because there were
already too many dupes...
Comment 6 Raphaël Quinet 2005-01-27 08:56:57 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 112401 ***