After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 111014 - Proposed preferred applications changes
Proposed preferred applications changes
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] Preferred applications
2.11.x
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks: 115435
 
 
Reported: 2003-04-17 12:38 UTC by Christian Neumair
Modified: 2007-02-22 15:57 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12


Attachments
Proposed patch. Had to regroup / redesign a lot. (107.26 KB, patch)
2003-04-17 12:40 UTC, Christian Neumair
none Details | Review
Screenshot illustrating the changes (32.56 KB, image/png)
2003-04-17 12:42 UTC, Christian Neumair
  Details
Old patch was a weird beast. This is a new one against HEAD. (99.21 KB, patch)
2003-07-15 17:55 UTC, Christian Neumair
none Details | Review
New patch. Forgot one dialog. Manny stupid. (103.63 KB, patch)
2003-07-15 17:59 UTC, Christian Neumair
needs-work Details | Review
New screenshot. As you can see, I didn't touch the mnemonics - they could/should be reassigned, though (18.26 KB, image/png)
2003-07-15 18:06 UTC, Christian Neumair
  Details

Description Christian Neumair 2003-04-17 12:38:54 UTC
I HIGified the preferred applications dialog.
Patch incoming.

regs,
 Chris
Comment 1 Christian Neumair 2003-04-17 12:40:35 UTC
Created attachment 15798 [details] [review]
Proposed patch. Had to regroup / redesign a lot.
Comment 2 Christian Neumair 2003-04-17 12:42:35 UTC
Created attachment 15799 [details]
Screenshot illustrating the changes
Comment 3 Christian Neumair 2003-04-17 15:27:12 UTC
Corrected some bug data.

regs,
 Chris
Comment 4 Kjartan Maraas 2003-04-22 23:12:14 UTC
Someone please review this.
Comment 5 Christian Neumair 2003-07-15 17:55:03 UTC
Created attachment 18318 [details] [review]
Old patch was a weird beast. This is a new one against HEAD.
Comment 6 Christian Neumair 2003-07-15 17:59:16 UTC
Created attachment 18320 [details] [review]
New patch. Forgot one dialog. Manny stupid.
Comment 7 Jody Goldberg 2003-07-15 18:00:34 UTC
a screenshot of the other dialog please
Comment 8 Christian Neumair 2003-07-15 18:04:19 UTC
My changes:
- Renamed dialog + .desktop items: Preferred Applications => Default
Applications
- Dialog+widget spacing now 100% HIG compliant
- Dialogs aren't resizable any longer. We really don't need that.
- Start in Terminal => Start in terminal
- Moved tab widgets out of "Default x" tab container frames. We don't
need to tell the user twice that he is in the def. app. dialog. This
bloated the patch.

regs,
 Chris
Comment 9 Christian Neumair 2003-07-15 18:06:35 UTC
Created attachment 18322 [details]
New screenshot. As you can see, I didn't touch the mnemonics - they could/should be reassigned, though
Comment 10 Calum Benson 2003-07-17 18:20:17 UTC
Changes sound/look fine to me.  Would be nice if there was something
more we could do to make the Text Editor and Terminal tabs more
consistent with the other two though, that text editor Properties
button in particular is kind of unpleasant, and clicking the "Custom
Editor" radio button pops up a new window, which is contra-HIG:

"Do not initiate an action when the user clicks a radio button.
However, if used in an instant-apply property or preference window,
update the setting represented by the radio button immediately."
Comment 11 Toni Willberg 2003-07-17 19:23:55 UTC
Hmm, where's the "Default image editor" tab? :)

Also, see bug 116128 as it's directly related to this applet's usability.
Comment 12 Christian Neumair 2003-07-17 19:41:34 UTC
Do you want me to move the widgets from the editor property dialog
into the main dialog or just to remove the callback definition which
pops up the text editor dialog when clicking the custom radio button?
BTW: What do you think about a terminology change: "Select a[n] x" =>
"Predefined x"?

regs,
 Chris
Comment 13 Calum Benson 2003-07-18 14:42:09 UTC
I think moving the widgets into the main dialog would be ok, I don't
think we're going to run into any overcrowding problems just yet :)

I see where you're coming from with the "predefined" suggestion, but
"predefined" doesn't quite feel like the right word to me.  "Standard"
probably isn't either, which is another one I thought of.  Cc'ing docs
guys to see if they have any suggestions...
Comment 14 Christian Neumair 2003-07-18 15:12:38 UTC
Registered?

regs,
 Chris
Comment 15 Christian Neumair 2003-07-19 10:59:09 UTC
In the old gnome-panel dialog we had the string "Known Applications".
Maybe that is appropriate.

Toni: You're right, it would be nice to have such a thingie - it's not
usability/UI-related, though.

regs,
 Chris
Comment 16 Dennis Cranston 2003-07-20 00:24:26 UTC
See also ui-review bug 98918. 
Comment 17 Andrew Sobala 2003-09-25 15:45:08 UTC
Reassigning preferred applications bugs into the component that, for some
reason, didn't exist until now. Filter for "Andrew doing reassignment work" to
get rid of this e-mail spam.
Comment 18 Sebastien Bacher 2004-10-23 14:53:41 UTC
this patch doesn't apply anymore, it need to be adapted for the current version
Comment 19 Sebastien Bacher 2005-01-13 01:56:20 UTC
any news on this ?
Comment 20 Sebastien Bacher 2005-05-22 15:49:00 UTC
the patch needs to be updated
Comment 21 Eugene O'Connor 2005-05-23 09:18:23 UTC
From looking at screenshot 18322 above, the captialization of the labels is
inconsistent.They should comply with the capitalization recommendation int he
HIG, see
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/2.0/design-text-labels.html#layout-capitalization.

I suggest the following changes:

s/Select a Web Browser/Select a web browser
s/Custom Web Browser/Custom web browser
Comment 22 Kjartan Maraas 2006-08-06 14:02:36 UTC
Is this still relevant and does it still need an updated patch?
Comment 23 Denis Washington 2007-02-22 15:57:28 UTC
Marking as obsolete as it doesn't seem actual anymore. Please reopen if there are still issues with the current interface.