After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 75773 - Command setting in profile not very useful
Command setting in profile not very useful
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 74598
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Havoc Pennington
Havoc Pennington
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-03-21 17:45 UTC by Ettore Perazzoli
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement



Description Ettore Perazzoli 2002-03-21 17:45:13 UTC
In GNOME Terminal 2, you can specify a custom command to run instead of the
shell for a defined profile, and that's good.

The way the feature works is kinda confusing though.  I don't think it's
clear to the user what happens when he changes the command, and how that
affects the terminal.

For example, I have set up a profile for ssh'ing to my laptop machine,
which specifies ssh as the custom command.  Now, to trigger ssh I have to
select the ssh profile from the Terminal menu, and then go File -> New
Window.  Not very intuitive.

So, I think we should at least have a "File -> New Window with Profile"
command, and also we should have a way to apply the change in the command
entry to the current terminals.  Or at least there should be an help text
explaining that that setting only applies if you open another window with
the same profile.  Or something.
Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2002-03-21 20:11:42 UTC
I think the basic problem is the lack of "new window with profile",
there's already a bug in here about adding that, it is required to
make the "command" feature useful. Or really to make profiles useful.

I don't think killing the current terminal process when you change the
command is at all a good idea, so there's some inherent possible
confusion, though I think people will figure it out. Suggested
improved wording is welcome.
Comment 2 Havoc Pennington 2002-03-24 06:46:22 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 74598 ***