After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 95671 - don't know why it crashed
don't know why it crashed
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] Backgrounds Emblems and Themes
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-10-13 11:03 UTC by tomvanvollenhoven
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description tomvanvollenhoven 2002-10-13 11:03:14 UTC
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: 2.0.5
Synopsis: don't know why it crashed
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: Backgrounds Emblems and Themes
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.0.3)

Description:
Description of Problem:


Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


How often does this happen?


Additional Information:




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
0x40cda739 in wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #1 sys_sigabbrev
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 gnome_scores_display_with_pixmap
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-10-13 07:03 -------

The original reporter (tomvanvollenhoven@hotmail.com) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.

Comment 1 John Fleck 2002-10-13 15:51:26 UTC
Without debugging symbols, we have no way to determine what happened.
I'd suggest upgrading (2.0.7 is the most recent) and filing a new bug
if you still have trouble.
Comment 2 Elijah Newren 2002-12-03 22:10:48 UTC
Hi, we've found several more reports similar to yours and want to
track the problem down.  Could you please go to
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100272
and mention that you were the reporter of bug 95671, and then tell us
what distribution you were using (or, if compiling yourself, what
compiler version and options)?  Thanks.

I'm leaving this bug closed.