After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 95544 - The Nautilus applications is reporting a crash
The Nautilus applications is reporting a crash
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: File and Folder Operations
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-10-11 18:45 UTC by adzenkotoku
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description adzenkotoku 2002-10-11 18:32:10 UTC
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: 0.3.2
Synopsis: The Nautilus applications is reporting a crash
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: File and Folder Operations
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.0.3)

Description:
Description of Problem:


Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


How often does this happen?


Additional Information:




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus-gtkhtml-view'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
0x40b4f739 in wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #1 sys_sigabbrev
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 gnome_scores_display_with_pixmap
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-10-11 14:32 -------

The original reporter (adzenkotoku@netscape.net) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.

Comment 1 John Fleck 2002-10-12 14:42:51 UTC
For a bug report to be useful, we need the information requested by
bug buddy to be filled in - a description of what led to the crash,
the steps needed to repeat it. We also need to know what version of
Nautilus, which can be had by pulling down the "help" menu and
clicking on "about". I'm closing this as "incomplete" because there is
not enough information here for us to use. If you continue to have the
problem, either reopen and add information or file a new report.
Thanks.
Comment 2 Elijah Newren 2002-12-03 22:08:25 UTC
Hi, we've found several more reports similar to yours and want to
track the problem down.  Could you please go to
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100272
and mention that you were the reporter of bug xxxxx, and then tell us
what distribution you were using (or, if compiling yourself, what
compiler version and options)?  Thanks.

I'm leaving this bug closed.
Comment 3 Elijah Newren 2002-12-03 22:09:33 UTC
Ooops, I meant to insert 95544 for xxxxx.  Please mention that you're
the reporter of bug 95544, it's much more helpful than saying you're
the reporter of "bug xxxxx".  I feel sheepish.  :}