After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 92243 - Closing an expanded tree causes crash
Closing an expanded tree causes crash
Status: VERIFIED INCOMPLETE
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-09-01 01:44 UTC by gabrieltalks
Modified: 2009-08-15 18:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description gabrieltalks 2002-09-01 10:44:58 UTC
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: 2.0.3
Synopsis: Closing and expanded tree cases crash
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: general
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.0.3)

Description:
Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. move mouse to expanded tree node
2. left-click
3. 

Actual Results:
crash

Expected Results:
tree node closes and display is refreshed

How often does this happen?
Infrequently, Not reproducible


Additional Information:




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
0x40cbc5e9 in wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #1 sys_sigabbrev
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 gnome_scores_display_with_pixmap
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-09-01 06:44 -------

Reassigning to the default owner of the component, nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.

Comment 1 John Fleck 2002-09-01 17:56:31 UTC
Difficult to deal with this bug without debugging symbols, but there
was a similar bug that has since been fixed. Could you try getting the
latest version (2.0.6) and see if the problem persists?
Thanks.
Comment 2 gabrieltalks 2002-09-01 18:41:02 UTC
okay
Comment 3 Elijah Newren 2002-11-09 12:54:22 UTC
Well, does the problem persist with any version of nautilus >= 2.0.6?
 
Comment 4 John Fleck 2002-11-22 14:11:47 UTC
No further info. Closing.
Comment 5 Elijah Newren 2002-12-03 22:22:05 UTC
Hi, we've found several more reports similar to yours and want to
track the problem down.  Whether or not nautilus >= 2.0.6 fixes the
problem (although yes, we'd still like to know the answer to that),
could you please go to
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100272
and mention that you were the reporter of bug 92243, and then tell us
what distribution you were using (or, if compiling yourself, what
compiler version and options)?  Thanks.

I'm leaving this bug closed.