After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 90341 - Random (?) seg fault in gnome-terminal
Random (?) seg fault in gnome-terminal
Status: VERIFIED INCOMPLETE
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Havoc Pennington
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-08-09 18:41 UTC by ryants
Modified: 2009-08-15 18:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description ryants 2002-08-09 18:40:55 UTC
Package: gnome-terminal
Severity: normal
Version: 2.0.1
Synopsis: Random (?) seg fault in gnome-terminal
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-terminal
Bugzilla-Component: general
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.0.1)

Description:
Description of Problem:

gnome-terminal crashes, seemingly at random

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1.  No steps... just happens
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


How often does this happen?

Once a day

Additional Information:




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
0x40af75e9 in wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #1 sys_sigabbrev
    from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 gnome_scores_display_with_pixmap
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-08-09 14:40 -------

Reassigning to the default owner of the component, hp@redhat.com.

Comment 1 Ben FrantzDale 2002-08-10 11:38:03 UTC
This stack trace looks like that of bug 88276, but that one's a
nautilus bug. Other than that, this bug looks unconfirmed, though.
Comment 2 Luis Villa 2002-08-12 21:40:28 UTC
It's not very useful either way. How did you build your packages, ryan?
Comment 3 ryants 2002-08-13 02:01:43 UTC
Yeah, I didn't think this would be particular useful; just wanted to
get it on the radar screen to see if it rang any bells.

All of my packages are built by the good folks at Mandrake.  I very
closely track the "Cooker" packages.  Here is what I have currently:

gnome-terminal-2.0.1-2mdk
libgnomeui2_0-2.0.3-1mdk
...

If you want to know anything else, don't hesitate to ask.  And my
feelings won't be hurt if you mark this bug "Closed: Useless" :)
Comment 4 Luis Villa 2002-08-13 16:00:59 UTC
Ah-ha! Mandrake! Fredric: probably, if you guys are going to ship
optimized packages that don't provide useful stack traces, you should
nuke bug-buddy from the distro. We get a lot of these types of traces
that have gnome-scores  function calls in completely unlikely places;
if they're mandrake's 'fault' it would be good to figure out  how and
why that happens.

Ryan: thanks for the effort :)