After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 86773 - crash on start-up
crash on start-up
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 86593
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] font properties
2.0.x
Other Linux
: Normal blocker
: ---
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-06-28 22:03 UTC by llordsmiff
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.0



Description llordsmiff 2002-06-28 22:03:15 UTC
From: Beta Tester <squeakman2k1@yahoo.com>
To: 
X-Mailer: bug-buddy 2.2.0
Subject: gnome-font-picker: crash on start-up

(This bug report was generated by Bug Buddy 2.2.0)
Description of Problem:
clicked icon from nautilus window and it got the sig segv in the heart.
nautilus didn't crash.

looks like a null pointer may be the cause? (i'd like to know if i read the
backtrace correctly, that was just my guess)

Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from
'/home/betatester/garnomes/current/bin/gnome-font-properties'

[New Thread 1024 (LWP 1366)]
0x408b8689 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6

Thread 1 (Thread 1024 (LWP 1366))

  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __check_rhosts_file
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    at wrapsyscall.c line 172
  • #3 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 620
  • #4 pthread_sighandler
    at signals.c line 97
  • #5 killpg
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 g_list_foreach
    at glist.c line 671
  • #7 gtk_window_set_icon_list
    at gtkwindow.c line 2213
  • #8 gtk_window_set_icon
    at gtkwindow.c line 2289
  • #9 setup_dialog
    at main.c line 66
  • #10 main
    at main.c line 93
  • #11 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6

Comment 1 llordsmiff 2002-06-28 22:33:57 UTC
this is a duplicate (i.e. i hit commit to many times)
Comment 2 llordsmiff 2002-06-28 22:35:07 UTC
oops, this is the wrong bug (the names are all alike).
i'll let someone else delete those 3 or so dups i posted :)
Comment 3 Luis Villa 2002-06-29 15:43:09 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 86593 ***