Bug 86746 – Crash - unknown

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 86746 - Crash - unknown


Summary:	Crash - unknown


Status:	RESOLVED OBSOLETE

Product:	gnome-core
Classification:	Deprecated
Component:	gnome-terminal
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other other

Importance:	Normal normal
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Luis Villa
QA Contact:	Luis Villa

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	95028 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2002-06-28 16:55 UTC by ken
Modified:	2003-02-09 02:49 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	---

Description ken 2002-06-28 16:56:08 UTC

Package: gnome-terminal
Severity: normal
Version: 1.4.0.8
Synopsis: Crash - unknown
Bugzilla-Product: gnome-terminal
Bugzilla-Component: general

Description:
It just started crashing, although the following was reported:
-----------------------------------------------
Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library

Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library

Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library

/emc/chilton/22038: No such file or directory.
-----------------------------------------------
It might be noted that /emc/chilton is my home directory.  It would seem
that 22038 is expected, but is probably in some sub directory.  I have
used this terminal for some time without problems, and know of nothing
that I changed, except that OpenOffice caused Gnome to crash and this
problem occurred after re-logging in.



Debugging Information:

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
0xfe89b970 in _libc_waitid ()

+ Trace 24431

#0 _libc_waitid
#1 _libc_waitpid
#2 gnome_init
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 .div
#5 gtk_marshal_NONE__POINTER
#6 gtk_signal_set_funcs
#7 gtk_signal_emit
#8 gtk_widget_size_allocate
#9 gtk_hbox_new
#10 gtk_marshal_NONE__POINTER
#11 gtk_signal_set_funcs
#12 gtk_signal_emit
#13 gtk_widget_size_allocate
#14 gnome_dns_abort
#15 gtk_marshal_NONE__POINTER
#16 gtk_signal_set_funcs
#17 gtk_signal_emit
#18 gtk_widget_size_allocate
#19 gtk_vbox_new
#20 gtk_marshal_NONE__POINTER
#21 gtk_signal_set_funcs
#22 gtk_signal_emit
#23 gtk_widget_size_allocate
#24 gtk_window_set_default_size
#25 gtk_marshal_NONE__POINTER
#26 gtk_signal_set_funcs
#27 gtk_signal_emit
#28 gtk_widget_size_allocate
#29 gtk_window_set_default_size
#30 gtk_window_set_default_size
#31 gtk_marshal_NONE__NONE
#32 gtk_signal_set_funcs
#33 gtk_signal_emit
#34 gtk_container_check_resize
#35 gtk_container_set_reallocate_redraws
#36 g_idle_dispatch
at gmain.c line 1367
#37 g_main_dispatch
at gmain.c line 656
#38 g_main_iterate
at gmain.c line 877
#39 g_main_run
at gmain.c line 935
#40 gtk_main
#41 new_terminal_for_client
#42 main
#0 _libc_waitid
#1 _libc_waitpid
#2 gnome_init
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 .div
#5 gtk_marshal_NONE__POINTER
#6 gtk_signal_set_funcs
#7 gtk_signal_emit





------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-06-28 12:56 -------

The original reporter (ken@chiltonfamily.org) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, hp@redhat.com.

Comment 1 ken 2002-06-28 17:16:12 UTC

Problem went away after full reboot.

Comment 2 Ben FrantzDale 2002-08-05 21:12:39 UTC

Old version => gnome-core/gnome-terminal.

Comment 3 Kjartan Maraas 2002-08-17 14:15:56 UTC

Has it ever happened again?

Comment 4 Kjartan Maraas 2002-08-17 14:16:11 UTC

Argh.

Comment 5 Vincent Untz 2002-10-10 18:02:18 UTC

*** Bug 95028 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Luis Villa 2003-02-09 02:38:00 UTC

Because of the release of GNOME 2.0 and 2.2, and the lack of interest in
maintainership of GNOME 1.4, the gnome-core product is being closed. If y0u feel
your bug is still of relevance to GNOME 2, please reopen it and refile it
against a more appropriate component. Thanks...

Comment 7 Luis Villa 2003-02-09 02:49:03 UTC

Argh. Apologies for the double spam. Actually closing this time.