After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 86081 - The stylesheets do not support appendices.
The stylesheets do not support appendices.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: yelp
Classification: Applications
Component: XSLT
1.0
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Sander Vesik
Yelp maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-06-20 23:03 UTC by Eric Baudais
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.0


Attachments
Patch to add support for appendix and section (9.59 KB, patch)
2003-04-03 08:41 UTC, Shaun McCance
none Details | Review

Description Eric Baudais 2002-06-20 23:03:08 UTC
Description:  When Yelp loads a DocBook document with an appendix the
document initially loads fine.  When you click on the appendix from the
TOC, the stylesheets load the entire document with no chunking.  Each
section of the document only has a footer with no header.  This condition
of the document continues and you need to reload the document in Yelp.

Expected Results:  When Yelp loads a DocBook document and you click on the
appendix in the TOC, the document should only show the appendix with
correct headers and footers.
Comment 1 Luis Villa 2002-06-21 02:04:06 UTC
How common are appendices?
Comment 2 Eric Baudais 2002-06-21 02:36:14 UTC
It is not a question whether appendices are very common, but what we
want out help system to support.  If we only want small application or
widget specific docs then there is no need for appendices.  If, on the
other hand, we want to support books and large manuals appendix
support is needed.
Comment 3 Sander Vesik 2002-06-21 12:48:32 UTC
There are no documents in gnome 2.0 that have appendices, but, just as
Eric says, it is definately something we want to support. 
Comment 4 Luis Villa 2002-06-25 19:51:39 UTC
Well, no, it /is/ a question. Yes, we want it to work, but given
finite resources, we have to pick and choose- and we're definitely not
(effectively) adding new features right now if this doesn't break
things we're currently doing.
Comment 5 Luis Villa 2002-06-25 20:19:15 UTC
Marking enhancement after talking a bit with Eric.
Comment 6 Sander Vesik 2002-06-25 21:07:51 UTC
erm...

"no, its not an enhancement" 

8-)
Comment 7 Luis Villa 2002-06-25 21:09:48 UTC
'Hrm, it's a feature we don't have and don't attempt to use.'  That
pretty much defines an enhancement. It may be a high priority
enhancement for you but it is still an enhancement. Whatever... if you
don't want your bugzilla organized and searchable go ahead.
Comment 8 Eric Baudais 2002-07-07 20:54:04 UTC
The GDP Handbook is actively using an appendix.  It is a feature we
want people to use where appropriate.  With the inclusion of the book
support I expect it to be a feature which will be used more often.
Comment 9 John Fleck 2002-11-25 03:37:02 UTC
MrProject's docs also use an appendix.
Comment 10 Shaun McCance 2003-04-03 08:41:16 UTC
Attaching a fix.  This patch also incorporates my fix for 100497.
Comment 11 Shaun McCance 2003-04-03 08:41:58 UTC
Created attachment 15429 [details] [review]
Patch to add support for appendix and section
Comment 12 Mikael Hallendal 2003-04-03 11:44:37 UTC
Applied to HEAD, thanks.