After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 85467 - Nautilus crashes when launching control-center modules
Nautilus crashes when launching control-center modules
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 84693
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-06-16 14:37 UTC by magnus_lofgren
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.0


Description magnus_lofgren 2002-06-16 12:38:43 UTC 
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: 2.0.0
Synopsis: Nautilus crashes when launching control-center modules
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: general
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.0.1)

Description:
Nautilus crashes everytime I lauch a second control-center module, from
preferences:///.

Go to preferences:/// in nautilus, click on a control-center module,
then close it. Click on another module, and watch nautilus crash and
burn.

It is not some random crash, it happens everytime I go through this
procedure, however, lauching them from the menu does not cause this
problem.

My system:

Software:
Debian GNU/Linux unstable, Linux kernel 2.4.18 with Robert Love's preemtible
kernel patch, glibc 2.2.5-6, XFree86 4.1.0, NVIDIA non-free binary
Detonator GLX/kernel driver 2880, Xft nohinting hack (for higher quality
AA fonts), GNOME 2 rc1 (garnome 0.11.0).

Irrelevant hardware notes :)
AMD Duron 1300 mhz CPU, ASUS A7V rev 1.02 m.board, Leadtek Winfast
GeForece2 MX 32mb display, 2x 128mb PC133 sdram, IBM 60GXP 40gb HDD,
10/100 mbit Leadtek 8139 compatible NIC, Creative Labs Soundblaster 128
pci audio.




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/home/magnus/garnome/bin/nautilus'

[New Thread 1024 (LWP 1064)]
[New Thread 2049 (LWP 1065)]
[New Thread 1026 (LWP 1066)]
[New Thread 2051 (LWP 1067)]
0x40a71a39 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 23896

Thread 4 (Thread 2051 (LWP 1067))

  • #0 sigsuspend
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 pthread_cond_wait
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 gnome_vfs_thread_pool_wait_for_work
    at gnome-vfs-thread-pool.c line 155
  • #4 thread_entry
    at gnome-vfs-thread-pool.c line 176
  • #5 pthread_start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 3 (Thread 1026 (LWP 1066))

  • #0 sigsuspend
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 pthread_cond_wait
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 gnome_vfs_thread_pool_wait_for_work
    at gnome-vfs-thread-pool.c line 155
  • #4 thread_entry
    at gnome-vfs-thread-pool.c line 176
  • #5 pthread_start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread 1024 (LWP 1064))

  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __check_rhosts_file
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 620
  • #4 pthread_sighandler
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 sigaction
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 gnome_vfs_monitor_cancel
    at gnome-vfs-ops.c line 726
  • #7 file_monitor_handle_unref_unlocked
    at vfolder-desktop-method.c line 429
  • #8 do_monitor_cancel
    at vfolder-desktop-method.c line 6061 




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-06-16 08:38 -------

The original reporter (magnus_lofgren@skidstaven.ac.se) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Comment 1 John Fleck 2002-06-16 13:46:07 UTC 
See #84693 - another possible dupe of that one? Yikes....
Comment 2 Luis Villa 2002-06-16 14:35:15 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 84693 ***