After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 85427 - Tree view crashes
Tree view crashes
Status: VERIFIED INCOMPLETE
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] Sidebar Panel: Tree
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-06-15 23:25 UTC by ryants
Modified: 2009-08-15 18:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description ryants 2002-06-15 23:25:40 UTC
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: 2.0.0
Synopsis: Tree view crashes
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: Sidebar Panel: Tree
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.0.1)

Description:
Description of Problem:

Tree view crashes every time.


Steps to reproduce the problem:
1.  Launch nautilus
2. Try to view a tree in the sidebar
3. 

Actual Results:

Crash after drawing the tree.

Expected Results:

Uhm... no crash :)

How often does this happen?

Every time.

Additional Information:




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1024 (LWP 8644)]
[New Thread 2049 (LWP 8645)]
[New Thread 1026 (LWP 8646)]
[New Thread 2051 (LWP 8647)]
0x40cfafd9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6

Thread 4 (Thread 2051 (LWP 8647))

  • #0 sigsuspend
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal
    at pthread.c line 1004
  • #2 pthread_cond_wait
    at restart.h line 34
  • #3 gnome_vfs_ssl_to_socket
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #4 pthread_start_thread
    at manager.c line 291

Thread 3 (Thread 1026 (LWP 8646))

  • #0 sigsuspend
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal
    at pthread.c line 1004
  • #2 pthread_cond_wait
    at restart.h line 34
  • #3 gnome_vfs_ssl_to_socket
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #4 pthread_start_thread
    at manager.c line 291

Thread 1 (Thread 1024 (LWP 8644))

  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 sys_sigabbrev
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    at wrapsyscall.c line 174
  • #3 gnome_scores_display_with_pixmap
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #4 pthread_sighandler
    at signals.c line 97
  • #5 sigaction
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-06-15 19:25 -------

Reassigning to the default owner of the component, nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.

Comment 1 John Fleck 2002-06-16 13:51:59 UTC
Need debugging to tell for sure, but this looks like #75159. Could you
try upgrading to the latest gtk+ (2.0.4) and report back if this is
fixed? Thanks.
Comment 2 ryants 2002-06-18 02:12:45 UTC
Upgrading to gtk+ 2.0.5 solved this problem.

Thanks.
Comment 3 John Fleck 2002-06-18 02:55:51 UTC
That's helpful information. Thanks for the followup.
Comment 4 Elijah Newren 2002-12-03 22:18:11 UTC
ryants@shaw.ca, we've received several similar reports, and are trying
to track them down.  These reports are for many different packages, so
we don't know if they might be related or not.  Could you got to 
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100272
and mention that you were the reporter of bug 85427, and then tell us
what distribution you were using (or, if compiling yourself, what
compiler version and options)?  Thanks.