After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 84507 - Backgrounds and emblems dialog should be divided up into two seperate dialogs
Backgrounds and emblems dialog should be divided up into two seperate dialogs
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] Backgrounds Emblems and Themes
0.x.x [obsolete]
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
AP4
Depends on: 534297
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-06-07 17:01 UTC by Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail]
Modified: 2010-08-02 11:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-06-07 17:01:04 UTC
Background and emblems dialog should be divided up into an emblems dialog
and a backgrounds dialog. Since from the user's perspective these are 2
totally separate actions.

Actually I'd be pretty happy if we just ditched the backgrounds
alltogether, as for one they are applied on a per direc tory basis (this
would be tricky to fix since they are set using xml files not gconf) and
basically the areas in the ui where backgrounds are used should probably
just be themed by gtk anyway... (eg. sidebar, and icon view background)
also the desktop has it's own method of setting the background, so this
isn't need for it. Man i just went way off on a tangent
Comment 1 Calum Benson 2002-06-07 18:20:06 UTC
FWIW I agree, backgrounds and emblems are a bizarre kind of
combination to have in the same dialog, especially as all the other
'change the colour of my windows'-related stuff is in the preferences
dialog.

Not sure what the best longer term solution is, but anything that gets
away from individual applications having their own independent theming
would be nice... it's a PITA for accessibility, if nothing else :/
Comment 2 Calum Benson 2003-04-03 14:46:27 UTC
Updating status_whiteboard field to reflect A11Y team's assessment 
of accessibility impact.
Comment 3 Calum Benson 2003-08-07 16:07:22 UTC
Apologies for spam... marking as GNOMEVER2.3 so it appears on the official GNOME
bug list :)
Comment 4 Calum Benson 2004-10-21 16:49:16 UTC
Apologies for spam-- ensuring Sun a11y team are cc'ed on all current a11y bugs.
 Filter on "SUN A11Y SPAM" to ignore.
Comment 5 Thomas Winwood 2006-02-13 23:43:01 UTC
Adding myself to the CC list.

Backgrounds are not a per-directory application in browser mode - perhaps it should be made a global setting in spatial mode? That would fix up the problem the bug really reports.
Comment 6 Calum Benson 2006-04-26 17:14:26 UTC
Apologies for spam... ensuring Sun a11y folks are cc'ed on all current accessibility bugs.
Comment 7 Cosimo Cecchi 2010-08-02 11:29:40 UTC
'Backgrounds and Emblems' have now been removed from nautilus master, see [1]. Closing this as OBSOLETE.

[1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2010-July/msg00023.html