GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 791893
Camera-developed JPG ignored when importing DNG
Last modified: 2018-03-07 15:52:22 UTC
Importing photos from my OnePlus Two (shot with HDR) results imported RAW+JPEG being developed by Shotwell, even though the settings are different. As a consequence, the resulting JPG is way too dark and grey-ish. See https://share.mhoff.net/171223_shotwell_bug.zip (file size exceeds attachment restrictions) for a test case. The files - IMG_20160903_172239_1.jpg - IMG_20160903_172239_1.dng physically reside on my mobile phone SD card. When importing those, the files - IMG_20160903_172239_1.jpg - IMG_20160903_172239_1.dng - IMG_20160903_172239_dng_shotwell.jpg are placed in my $HOME/Pictures folder. As you can see, the file generated by shotwell (suffix "_dng_shotwell.jpg") is way too dark and does not even remotely match the quality of the jpg-file generated by the phone. Still, shotwell chooses to render the dng-file itself, completely ignores the phone-generated jpg-file and, even though the default developer is "Camera" *and* I manually set the developer to "Camera", shotwell sticks with its jpg-version of the file. I figure this bug might be related to RAW+JPEG pair discovery. However, I also tried to first copy the files to my local filesystem and import them from there, but still, shotwell chooses to develop the image itself.
Please ignore the "_1" part of the file-names. These are results from multiple attempts to fix the problem.
Can you check what your default RAW developer is set to? The image quality and naming suggests that it is set to Shotwell, not Camera. You can check this in Edit -> Preferences, right at the bottom.
Meh, sorry. Didn't read properly.
Created attachment 365931 [details] [review] Don't wrongly fall back to shotwell developer If we requested CAMERA development, but the RAW file did not have any preview embedded, Shotwell falls back to the SHOTWELL developer, even though we have the camera-developed fle available Only fall back to SHOTWELL if embedded was chosen and embedded is not available.
Attachment 365931 [details] pushed as b80a42d - Don't wrongly fall back to shotwell developer
*** Bug 742809 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***