After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 786912 - Make hyperlink dashed underline lighter
Make hyperlink dashed underline lighter
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: vte
Classification: Core
Component: general
0.49.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: VTE Maintainers
VTE Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2017-08-28 13:53 UTC by Egmont Koblinger
Modified: 2017-08-31 19:35 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Proposed change (1.16 KB, patch)
2017-08-28 14:48 UTC, Egmont Koblinger
none Details | Review

Description Egmont Koblinger 2017-08-28 13:53:06 UTC
Currently hyperlink underlines have a fill ratio of about 1/2 (rounded downwards).

Let's make them lighter, maybe around 1/3.

(I didn't put any thinking/experimenting into the current implementation, it's just the one that suddenly occurred to me and later on I found it good enough not to change it.)

Looks like coreutils-8.28 (to be released real soon now) will introduce "ls --hyperlink" (hooray!). The author is concerned that underlying all files gives too much visual clutter, and I tend to agree with him. See this particular discussion starting at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2017-08/msg00061.html.

A fill ratio of 1/3 looks less crowded, underscore characters (e.g. in filenames) are more clearly distinguishable from spaces, and one-off hyperlinks produced by other apps are still clearly noticeable.

(As also mentioned in that thread, maybe we should introduce a parameter telling not to underline these hyperlinks at all. I'm not sure about it, I'd definitely like to wait with this until we gather sufficient user feedback. It'll be a different bug entry, if at all.)
Comment 1 Egmont Koblinger 2017-08-28 14:48:26 UTC
Created attachment 358602 [details] [review]
Proposed change
Comment 2 Egmont Koblinger 2017-08-28 15:05:58 UTC
I guess 1/6 would be nicer than 0.1666 :)
Comment 3 Egmont Koblinger 2017-08-31 19:35:18 UTC
Submitted.