GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 778322
lite nautilus for wayland without xwayland without gvfs and x deppend.
Last modified: 2017-02-10 13:36:18 UTC
hello. i use weston with wayland without xwayland and no have filemanager. i want install nautilus but see x11-common depends and it stop me, becouse i want pure wayland. now i use in clear wayland rhytmbox, eog, gnome-clock, file-roller, epiphany and all it packages no have depends x11-common with gvfs. you can make lite version nautilus for simple use n desktop without network support but only operations with files? if is no hard, make pls. lite-nautilus is very good for many user idea and i belive what very many users begin use it version. thanks.
I think it's possible yes, it requires some digging though, and the long term plan is to make it happen (if it's not possible already, always disabling the desktop support of nautilus of course)
I just noticed you asked for no gvfs support, I don't think that can happen (and why is it relevant for X?)
wow. i think many users use nautilus without network, and more many not use him because him support network (not like many depends example). i very like weston and i wait gnome shell native wayland without x11 depends and xwayland. my machine not very strong because i use it and very good results, fast, stable. but i understand you no be do lite version nautilus this is no corporate style maybe. i need wait, i think. thanks for reply.
(In reply to Carlos Soriano from comment #2) > I just noticed you asked for no gvfs support, I don't think that can happen > (and why is it relevant for X?) gvfs need x11-common
ah okay, you need to file a bug report against gvfs then.
)) gvfs say me who you, what you want and etc. and i no have account gvfs bugzila. you can do it? if it do you or gnome-team gvfs very good understand what need make.
Not sure I understand, but gvfs is part of GNOME, here you can file a bug report https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gvfs feel free to link to this bug report too so they know the context.
wow good. and more. i try run nautilus after week in pure weston, but write not can display. if gvfs remove x11-common depends, nautilus be good work?
I'm sorry, but I cannot understand. Can you try to write without abbreviations and slightly more proper English? A spell checker usually helps too
I have started a nautilus last week, in a pure wayland via the terminal, but the answer was such. can't find the display x
also i now look in aptitude, nautilus need x11-utils and i think what trough this package nautilus connect display server and no can find display x, because i use wayland.
It is unclear to me which problem this task is about. Can you please clarify which underlying problem you would like to solve, in complete sentences without abbreviations?
(In reply to André Klapper from comment #12) > It is unclear to me which problem this task is about. > Can you please clarify which underlying problem you would like to solve, in > complete sentences without abbreviations? i want nautilus for pure wayland without xwayland and x11-common and x11-utils how epiphany, rhytmbox, gnome-terminal etc gn0me apps. only nautilus no can work with clear wayland west0n now. and i want know when you can it do? thank you
You have already been told that the x11-common dependency is because of gvfs and not because of Nautilus itself. Is there any *direct* dependency of Nautilus? If so, please name it.
(In reply to André Klapper from comment #14) > You have already been told that the x11-common dependency is because of gvfs > and not because of Nautilus itself. Is there any *direct* dependency of > Nautilus? If so, please name it. more no. gvfs need x11-utils and x11-common
Clear answers are welcome. It sounds like the problem is in gvfs and not in Nautilus. You already created bug 778338 about gvfs. Hence I close this ticket as INVALID.
(In reply to André Klapper from comment #16) > Clear answers are welcome. > It sounds like the problem is in gvfs and not in Nautilus. > You already created bug 778338 about gvfs. > Hence I close this ticket as INVALID. yes here and there, i don't know who know what need do with it, sry.