After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 760331 - GtkProgressBar .osd style change
GtkProgressBar .osd style change
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Themes
3.19.x
Other Linux
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: gtk-bugs
gtk-bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2016-01-08 19:29 UTC by Michael Catanzaro
Modified: 2016-01-11 12:14 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Michael Catanzaro 2016-01-08 19:29:19 UTC 
Epiphany (and I think also GNOME Builder) use an .osd progress bar in order to draw just the progress portion of the bar, without trough. Prior to 3.19, the non-progress portion of the bar was completely transparent. But now it is pure black, which looks bad.
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2016-01-09 17:49:03 UTC 
just ftr, I don't think .osd is a great fit for this. Might be nicer to just style overlay > progressbar, or add a dedicated style class for it.
Comment 2 Lapo Calamandrei 2016-01-09 18:02:02 UTC 
The style looks, theoretically, good
Comment 3 Michael Catanzaro 2016-01-09 18:31:13 UTC 
(In reply to Matthias Clasen from comment #1)
> just ftr, I don't think .osd is a great fit for this. Might be nicer to just
> style overlay > progressbar, or add a dedicated style class for it.

Either way works for us.

(In reply to Lapo Calamandrei from comment #2)
> The style looks, theoretically, good

To be clear, we want a way to show the blue portion of the progress bar while leaving the rest transparent. Previously this was accomplished using .osd.
Comment 4 Lapo Calamandrei 2016-01-09 18:43:23 UTC 
yeah I know, I'll try to figure out wassup asap
Comment 5 Lapo Calamandrei 2016-01-09 19:08:55 UTC 
Michael, can you try with latest and greatest? This should be fixed now.
Comment 6 Michael Catanzaro 2016-01-09 23:42:01 UTC 
Yeah, it's transparent now, thanks!

I wouldn't mention epiphany (or any particular applications) in the GTK+ docs though; never know when we might ditch the progress bar.
Comment 7 Lapo Calamandrei 2016-01-11 12:14:44 UTC 
I think citing an example is the best thing to do there, maybe citing the version?