GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 756883
Add an option for line wrapping in a quoted text
Last modified: 2016-04-15 10:35:32 UTC
Moving this from a downstream bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273403 Some people like to have the quoted parts wrapped (bug #650645, bug #732139), but some not. It does make sense in some cases, but not in another. Let's have a UI option, in Edit->Preferences->Composer Preferences->Replies and Forwards section->Wrap quoted text in replies, with a default to TRUE. Users whom do not like this option can turn it off easily, instead of selecting whole quotation and changing paragraph style from Normal to Preformatted.
Yes, please... Also fwiw, changing from "Normal" to "Preformatted" is not really a workaround. It does remove the extra LFs that were added, but the quoted then has a bunch of '>' sprinkled in the middle of the lines. That seems like a bug, really... FWIW, I'm running evolution-3.16.5-3.fc22.x86_64.
(In reply to Jeff Layton from comment #1) > workaround. It does remove the extra LFs that were added, but the quoted > then has a bunch of '>' sprinkled in the middle of the lines. That seems > like a bug, really... Please open a separate bug for it, attach the reproducer (message) and describe the exact steps how to reproduce it.
Done -- see bug #756900.
Fixed with following commit: Bug 756883 - Add an option for line wrapping in a quoted text This patch adds a new "Wrap quoted text in replies" option under the "Edit->Preferences->Composer Preferences->Replies and Forwards" section in preferences. If set to FALSE the quoted text in replies will be parsed to 'Preformated' blocks and the won't be wrapped. The option is set to TRUE by default, so the behavior won't change for current users. Also rename various variables/functions around code that parses the HTML to blocks to reflect that we are not parsing just to paragraphs. commit f436ed10b8a8b2ed3b9c418e7706a7526848fc5c in the master branch for Evolution 3.19.1+
*** Bug 757505 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 765092 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***