After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 743742 - workbench: Allow half tiled window for small resolutions
workbench: Allow half tiled window for small resolutions
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: gnome-builder
Classification: Other
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Builder Maintainers
GNOME Builder Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2015-01-30 14:38 UTC by Carlos Soriano
Modified: 2015-02-09 23:51 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
workbench: Allow half tiled window for small resolutions (2.88 KB, patch)
2015-01-30 14:38 UTC, Carlos Soriano
none Details | Review

Description Carlos Soriano 2015-01-30 14:38:25 UTC
Just noticed while working on my laptop (and since I still need to use
terminal for compiling, I have tiled windows)
Comment 1 Carlos Soriano 2015-01-30 14:38:28 UTC
Created attachment 295804 [details] [review]
workbench: Allow half tiled window for small resolutions

There is still a common screen resolution on laptops of 1366x768.
To allow those to half tile the builder window we have to reduce
some minimum widths.
Comment 2 Christian Hergert 2015-02-03 15:32:08 UTC
I don't think I'm going to apply this patch.

We have a bunch more stuff that is going to end up in the header bar, and being anything but a maximized application on < 1440px is probably not worth the divergent design that will have to occur.

I did mention to Allan that I'd like a ".small" css selector for some things. But without strong HIG advice, it will clearly get overused.

So in summary, "It's gonna' get worse" :)
Comment 3 Carlos Soriano 2015-02-03 15:40:49 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I don't think I'm going to apply this patch.
> 
> We have a bunch more stuff that is going to end up in the header bar, and being
> anything but a maximized application on < 1440px is probably not worth the
> divergent design that will have to occur.
> 
> I did mention to Allan that I'd like a ".small" css selector for some things.
> But without strong HIG advice, it will clearly get overused.
> 
> So in summary, "It's gonna' get worse" :)

Right, I was actually wondering that as well