After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 740278 - 'atk_misc_get_type' is deprecated
'atk_misc_get_type' is deprecated
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: java-atk-wrapper
Classification: Applications
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: java-atk-wrapper maintainer(s)
java-atk-wrapper maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2014-11-17 18:18 UTC by Magdalen Berns (irc magpie)
Modified: 2015-02-27 16:57 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Patch to address problem (2.13 KB, patch)
2014-11-17 19:40 UTC, Magdalen Berns (irc magpie) 		committed Details | Review

Description Magdalen Berns (irc magpie) 2014-11-17 18:18:01 UTC 
Found at:

jawutil.c:879:1
jawutil.c:884:2
jawutil.c:890:2
jawutil.c:891:2

Not sure what best to replace it with.
Comment 1 Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias (IRC: infapi00) 2014-11-17 18:27:54 UTC 
It seems that jawutil has a implementation of AtkMisc. But the implementation has a dummy (empty) implementation for all the methods: jaw_misc_init, jaw_misc_threads_enter and jaw_misc_threads_leave does nothing.

Additionally, that interface and those methods are not used on the code at all. 

So, what about just remove it?
Comment 2 Magdalen Berns (irc magpie) 2014-11-17 19:29:03 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> It seems that jawutil has a implementation of AtkMisc. But the implementation
> has a dummy (empty) implementation for all the methods: jaw_misc_init,
> jaw_misc_threads_enter and jaw_misc_threads_leave does nothing.
> 
> Additionally, that interface and those methods are not used on the code at all. 
> 
> So, what about just remove it?

This seems like a sensible plan if the interface isn't being used. I'll look into removing any other AtkMisc references too in that case, if this also makes sense?
Comment 3 Magdalen Berns (irc magpie) 2014-11-17 19:40:07 UTC 
Created attachment 290876 [details] [review]
Patch to address problem

I think this addresses the problem but I'll leave it open, just in case I misinterpreted.
Comment 4 André Klapper 2015-02-27 16:57:31 UTC 
[Moving at-spi/java-atk-wrapper bugs to separate product. See bug 740075]