After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 731439 - gvfsd-sftp consume too much CPU
gvfsd-sftp consume too much CPU
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 724780
Product: gvfs
Classification: Core
Component: sftp backend
1.20.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gvfs-maint
gvfs-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2014-06-10 07:46 UTC by Mikhail
Modified: 2014-08-25 14:39 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
htop screenshot (269.31 KB, image/png)
2014-06-10 07:46 UTC, Mikhail 		Details
backtraces of gvfsd-sftp (1.74 KB, application/x-gzip)
2014-06-10 07:46 UTC, Mikhail 		Details
backtraces of gvfsd-sftp 2 (2.01 KB, application/x-gzip)
2014-06-10 07:48 UTC, Mikhail 		Details

Description Mikhail 2014-06-10 07:46:01 UTC 
Created attachment 278179 [details]
htop screenshot

gvfsd-sftp consume too much CPU

$ rpm -qa | grep gvfs
gvfs-mtp-1.20.2-1.fc20.i686
gvfs-fuse-1.20.2-1.fc20.i686
gvfs-gphoto2-1.20.2-1.fc20.i686
gvfs-afc-1.20.2-1.fc20.i686
gvfs-goa-1.20.2-1.fc20.i686
gvfs-archive-1.20.2-1.fc20.i686
gvfs-1.20.2-1.fc20.i686
gvfs-afp-1.20.2-1.fc20.i686
gvfs-smb-1.20.2-1.fc20.i686
Comment 1 Mikhail 2014-06-10 07:46:35 UTC 
Created attachment 278180 [details]
backtraces of gvfsd-sftp
Comment 2 Mikhail 2014-06-10 07:48:02 UTC 
Created attachment 278181 [details]
backtraces of gvfsd-sftp 2
Comment 3 Ross Lagerwall 2014-06-10 11:26:19 UTC 
What were you doing with the sftp mount? Was it idle or were you performing some operation?

Unfortunately, none of these backtraces show the process actually doing anything, all the threads are just blocked in poll().

Does this happen often so that we can try debug the issue?

Thanks
Comment 4 Ross Lagerwall 2014-06-11 16:56:07 UTC 
I see now you've reported a similar issue as bug 724780. Is it a duplicate?
Comment 5 Ross Lagerwall 2014-08-25 14:39:09 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 724780 ***