After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 730737 - List object is too small on "many albums found" dialog
List object is too small on "many albums found" dialog
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 721885
Product: sound-juicer
Classification: Applications
Component: interface
3.4.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Sound Juicer Maintainers
Sound Juicer Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2014-05-25 22:41 UTC by franc00018
Modified: 2014-05-26 09:28 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
screen shot of the problem (21.05 KB, image/png)
2014-05-25 22:41 UTC, franc00018 		Details

Description franc00018 2014-05-25 22:41:24 UTC 
Created attachment 277163 [details]
screen shot of the problem

This is on Version 3.5.0 But it's not in the list up there.

OS is linux mint 17 RC with MATE desktop

The list object where IO can choose one album entry when many were found is too small and does not grow when I change the size of the dialog box. So It's really hard to read the entries.
I put a screenshot as it should be obvious with it.
Comment 1 Phillip Wood 2014-05-26 09:28:43 UTC 
Thank you for taking the time to report this. It has actually been fixed by commit 06d072b in the latest 3.12 release. If you contact the package maintainer they should be able to apply the patch for that commit to version 3.5.0 or possibly update the package to the latest version which adds more information to this dialog to make it easier to differentiate between the albums. 

As a quick fix you could edit /usr/share/sound-juicer/sound-juicer.ui
If you search for the line

<object class="GtkScrolledWindow" id="scrolledwindow2">

You can add

<property name="expand">True</property>

immediately below it to fix the problem.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 721885 ***