After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 720356 - With heavy load skip lookup account details doesn't
With heavy load skip lookup account details doesn't
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
3.8.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2013-12-12 21:45 UTC by Matěj Cepl
Modified: 2014-08-25 18:14 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Matěj Cepl 2013-12-12 21:45:49 UTC 
(originally filed as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032985)

screenshot of the dialog is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=827129

Description of problem:
I am refreshing my main RH mail account (multi-gigabyte enterprise) and when adding as a second account my personal one, I get bogged on "Lookup Account Details" dialog. I tried to skip that lookup (which doesn't make much sense anyway, because details of my personal IMAP server won't be found anyway).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
evolution-3.8.5-10.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
happened once.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Milan Crha 2014-02-07 15:51:46 UTC 
Works fine for me, I can click the "skip lookup" button and it is done immediately, while another IMAP+ account is updating in the background. This is with (to be) 3.10.4. I guess it was just a momentary issue with api.gnome.org, similar to bug #720387.

Could you retest, please?
Comment 2 André Klapper 2014-08-25 18:14:12 UTC 
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for.
Thanks!