After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 719881 - Useless white space below window's title bar
Useless white space below window's title bar
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: gnome-themes-standard
Classification: Core
Component: WM theme
3.10.x
Other Linux
: Low minor
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-themes-standard-maint
gnome-themes-standard-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2013-12-05 05:34 UTC by Bojan Smojver
Modified: 2015-04-28 06:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Comparison of white space in the title bar: 3.8 v 3.10 (9.02 KB, image/png)
2014-05-06 11:38 UTC, Bojan Smojver
Details
Gnome Terminal on F-20 (5.02 KB, image/png)
2014-05-06 11:58 UTC, Bojan Smojver
Details
Gnome Terminal on F-20: Clearlooks (6.33 KB, image/png)
2014-05-06 12:06 UTC, Bojan Smojver
Details

Description Bojan Smojver 2013-12-05 05:34:31 UTC
Description of problem:
This version of Gnome reintroduces waste of vertical space again. Gnome terminal, Remmina etc. all come with a strip of useless white (well, grey) space below the title bar. This makes windows unnecessarily bigger (vertically) and wastes precious pixels on a wide screen display.

I don't really know which Gnome component is responsible for this, so assigning to desktop for now. Maybe it is the adwaita theme - no idea.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-themes-standard-3.10.0-1.fc20.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run most any Gnome app.

Actual results:
Wastes vertical space.

Expected results:
This was not the case in F-19.

Additional info:
See downstream bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037786
Comment 1 Bojan Smojver 2014-02-05 06:03:34 UTC
Ping... Two months and zero replies to this bug...
Comment 2 Bojan Smojver 2014-04-29 04:46:34 UTC
Another ping...

Isn't there anyone on Gnome development/design team that cares to fix this waste of vertical space?
Comment 3 Allan Day 2014-05-05 11:18:23 UTC
Hi Bojan, sorry for not replying to this sooner. The designs have actually been updated since 3.10, and it's hard to tell exactly what changed between 3.8.x and 3.10.x.

If you could post comparison screenshots that would be useful.
Comment 4 Bojan Smojver 2014-05-06 01:08:25 UTC
You can see the screenshots in the downstream bug.

F20: loads of unwanted "white" space:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=832279

F19: the opposite:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=832280

Essentially, that's the difference between Gnome 3.8 and 3.10.

To see why this is objectively worse, read this comment in the downstream bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037786#c8
Comment 5 Allan Day 2014-05-06 09:32:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> You can see the screenshots in the downstream bug.
> 
> F20: loads of unwanted "white" space:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=832279
> 
> F19: the opposite:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=832280
> 
> Essentially, that's the difference between Gnome 3.8 and 3.10.
...

Those images don't seem to be full size. Can you provide full size screenshots of 3.8, 3.10 and 3.12?
Comment 6 Bojan Smojver 2014-05-06 11:38:47 UTC
Created attachment 275966 [details]
Comparison of white space in the title bar: 3.8 v 3.10

I never mentioned 3.12 - I don't have any machine that runs it.

I also don't have F-19 any more, but it was trivial to do this in Gimp to compare the two.
Comment 7 Allan Day 2014-05-06 11:49:50 UTC
Those screenshots look scaled down. I can provide a 3.12 screenshot, but it's hard to comment without knowing exactly how the size has changed (in pixels).
Comment 8 Bojan Smojver 2014-05-06 11:57:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> Those screenshots look scaled down. I can provide a 3.12 screenshot, but it's
> hard to comment without knowing exactly how the size has changed (in pixels).

They are not scaled down. I just like small font inside Gnome Terminal.

I'll attach you a screenshot from F-20 and you'll see what I'm talking about.
Comment 9 Bojan Smojver 2014-05-06 11:58:02 UTC
Created attachment 275967 [details]
Gnome Terminal on F-20
Comment 10 Bojan Smojver 2014-05-06 11:59:59 UTC
You can see from the screenshot of the terminal how much white space is above/below the title. If you look at the window controls, it is also obvious how out of proportion the whole thing is.
Comment 11 Bojan Smojver 2014-05-06 12:06:57 UTC
Created attachment 275969 [details]
Gnome Terminal on F-20: Clearlooks

Just as a point of comparison, here is a screenshot with Clearlooks theme selected. The proportions are more "normal". Take a look at window controls on the right, for instance - there is only necessary white space above/below.
Comment 12 Jakub Steiner 2014-07-01 11:37:45 UTC
I have to disagree with your point of view. Whitespace isn't useless. Along with grid it's the cornerstone of visual design. 

With headerbars and focusing on common actions we were able to increase the usable vertical screen estate and cut down on chrome without lowering legibility and making the font size so tiny.
Comment 13 Bojan Smojver 2014-07-01 12:39:40 UTC
(In reply to comment #12)
> I have to disagree with your point of view. Whitespace isn't useless. Along
> with grid it's the cornerstone of visual design. 

There is no "point of view" - three terminal windows no longer fit on my screen vertically and there is nothing more to see in the title bar than previously. Ergo, the addition of _that_ space is useless.
Comment 14 Bojan Smojver 2015-04-28 06:20:43 UTC
Good enough workaround:

$ cat .config/gtk-3.0/gtk.css 
.header-bar.default-decoration {
    padding-top: 2px;
    padding-bottom: 2px;
}
.header-bar.default-decoration .button.titlebutton {
    padding-top: 1px;
    padding-bottom: 1px;
}