After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 719759 - Add libgfbgraph to the modulesets
Add libgfbgraph to the modulesets
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: jhbuild
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: module sets
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Jhbuild maintainers
Jhbuild QA
Depends on:
Blocks: 701499
 
 
Reported: 2013-12-03 10:24 UTC by Debarshi Ray
Modified: 2013-12-03 11:22 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
3.12: add libgfbgraph (1.27 KB, patch)
2013-12-03 10:25 UTC, Debarshi Ray
committed Details | Review

Description Debarshi Ray 2013-12-03 10:24:18 UTC
libgfbgraph (https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgfbgraph) is a GLib/GObject wrapper for the Facebook Graph API. It will be used (see bug701499) to add a Facebook miner to gnome-online-miners.
Comment 1 Debarshi Ray 2013-12-03 10:25:26 UTC
Created attachment 263385 [details] [review]
3.12: add libgfbgraph
Comment 2 Debarshi Ray 2013-12-03 10:35:23 UTC
From #gnome-hackers on GIMPNet:

10:23 <rishi> fredp: Hey!
10:23 <rishi> fredp: What do you think of                                       
      https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719759 ?
10:23 <Services> Bug 719759: normal, Normal, ---, jhbuild-maint, UNCONFIRMED,   
      Add libgfbgraph to the modulesets
10:25 <fredp> rishi: fine, make sure there's a tarball released for 3.11.3
10:26 <rishi> fredp: There is one.
10:26 <rishi> http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/gfbgraph/0.2/
10:27 <fredp> rishi: excellent; I see it now, I was looking at libgfbgraph; it  
      would be much easier for the tools if the names matched.
10:27 <rishi> fredp: Yeah.
10:27 <rishi> fredp: I mentioned it to the maintainer. I did not write the      
      thing.
10:28 <fredp> if it's possible to change the tarball basename it will really    
      be appreciated.
10:28 <rishi> At this point it might be easier to change the name of the        
      Git. Or would that be a problem?
10:29 <fredp> rishi: not at all
10:29 <rishi> Ok. I will poke him again.
10:29 <fredp> great, thanks.
Comment 3 Álvaro Peña 2013-12-03 11:22:25 UTC
Hi!

I'll try to change the tarball basename ASAP in first term.

Thanks for the inclusion of GFBGraph in JHBuild!

(In reply to comment #2)
> From #gnome-hackers on GIMPNet:
> 
> 10:23 <rishi> fredp: Hey!
> 10:23 <rishi> fredp: What do you think of                                       
>       https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719759 ?
> 10:23 <Services> Bug 719759: normal, Normal, ---, jhbuild-maint, UNCONFIRMED,   
>       Add libgfbgraph to the modulesets
> 10:25 <fredp> rishi: fine, make sure there's a tarball released for 3.11.3
> 10:26 <rishi> fredp: There is one.
> 10:26 <rishi> http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/gfbgraph/0.2/
> 10:27 <fredp> rishi: excellent; I see it now, I was looking at libgfbgraph; it  
>       would be much easier for the tools if the names matched.
> 10:27 <rishi> fredp: Yeah.
> 10:27 <rishi> fredp: I mentioned it to the maintainer. I did not write the      
>       thing.
> 10:28 <fredp> if it's possible to change the tarball basename it will really    
>       be appreciated.
> 10:28 <rishi> At this point it might be easier to change the name of the        
>       Git. Or would that be a problem?
> 10:29 <fredp> rishi: not at all
> 10:29 <rishi> Ok. I will poke him again.
> 10:29 <fredp> great, thanks.