After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 702532 - give a visual clue to follow a specific path
give a visual clue to follow a specific path
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Navigation
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2013-06-18 07:36 UTC by Luc Pi
Modified: 2021-06-18 15:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Luc Pi 2013-06-18 07:36:52 UTC
Give a visual clue to follow a specific path

In a computer folder tree, there are paths that we follow most often, but each time we need to choose among multiple folders to follow the path.

There are also paths that we follow rarely, but we never completely remember the path.

There must be a visual way to mark such paths.
Comment 1 Luc Pi 2013-06-18 07:38:01 UTC
One concrete scenario is to find the videos on my camera. 
The path is completely cryptic:
.
├── DCIM
├── MISC
└── PRIVATE
    └── AVCHD
        ├── AVCHDTN
        ├── BDMV
        │   ├── CLIPINF
        │   ├── PLAYLIST
        │   └── STREAM
        └── IISVPL

I used to have a generic emblem on each folder of the path.
(but emblems are gone)
Comment 2 António Fernandes 2013-06-18 09:46:47 UTC
Why not a bookmark or a symbolic link to the path? It is easier to set up than marking every single directory in the path. Opening a bookmark of a symbolic link is also faster than iterating through the directories in the path.
Comment 3 Luc Pi 2013-06-24 13:54:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Why not a bookmark

The space given to bookmarks is very limited.
I would rather not add too many of them.
otherwise we loose the benefit of bookmarks at all.


> or a symbolic link to the path? It is easier to set up than
> marking every single directory in the path.

Yes, a symbolic link could be a solution. I am using it in some cases. But you get the same problem as soon as you have more than a few links to choose from

Also, in the example in comment #1, it is a FAT filesystem which does not support symbolic links.


> Opening a bookmark of a symbolic
> link is also faster than iterating through the directories in the path.

It is easier to follow a well tagged/marked path (= n brainless clicks),
than to find a name in a list.
Comment 4 André Klapper 2021-06-18 15:29:34 UTC
GNOME is going to shut down bugzilla.gnome.org in favor of gitlab.gnome.org.
As part of that, we are mass-closing older open tickets in bugzilla.gnome.org
which have not seen updates for a longer time (resources are unfortunately
quite limited so not every ticket can get handled).

If you can still reproduce the situation described in this ticket in a recent
and supported software version of Files (nautilus), then please follow
  https://wiki.gnome.org/GettingInTouch/BugReportingGuidelines
and create a new ticket at
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/

Thank you for your understanding and your help.