After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 693078 - Regularly forgets contents of the inbox
Regularly forgets contents of the inbox
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 693101
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
3.8.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2013-02-03 01:33 UTC by Bastien Nocera
Modified: 2013-09-13 01:08 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Bastien Nocera 2013-02-03 01:33:32 UTC 
evolution-data-server-3.7.3-2.fc19.x86_64
evolution-3.7.3.2-3.fc19.x86_64

Evo crashes every now and then (it's 3.7, probably webkit related), but Evo pretty regularly and on startup seems to forget what the content of the inbox folder is, and it will redownload the full message list.

I have 20k e-mails, and a crappy hotel connection and this makes for a painful experience.
Comment 1 Milan Crha 2013-02-27 14:15:23 UTC 
Thanks for a bug report. This sounds just like bug #693101, could you retest with a more recent version, which has the change from bug #693101 included, please?
Comment 2 Bastien Nocera 2013-02-27 14:50:41 UTC 
Which versions of evolutions have the fix?
Comment 3 Milan Crha 2013-02-27 16:45:37 UTC 
Based on bug #693101 comment #16 it's 3.7.91+ (oops, to be released around Monday). You can pick the patch from the previous comment there, in case you can compile it.
Comment 4 Tobias Mueller 2013-06-10 08:48:16 UTC 
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 693101 ***