After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 69244 - gtk_item_factory_add_foreign()
gtk_item_factory_add_foreign()
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Widget: Other
2.0.x
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gtk-bugs
gtk-bugs
Depends on: 69242
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-01-21 08:10 UTC by Matthias Clasen
Modified: 2011-02-04 16:16 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Matthias Clasen 2002-01-21 08:10:33 UTC 
The documentation for gtk_item_factory_add_foreign() should recommend
the use of gtk_menu_item_set_accel_path()/gtk_widget_set_accel_path()
once the latter is exported, and possibly gtk_item_factory_add_foreign()
should be deprecated.
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2002-03-11 16:05:15 UTC 
gtk_menu_item_set_accel_path()/gtk_widget_set_accel_path()
are public now, so gtk_item_factory_add_foreign() docs should
recommend them.
Comment 2 Matthias Clasen 2002-03-11 22:07:25 UTC 
Done now. Leaving this open as a reminder to deprecate
gtk_item_factory_add_foreign() at the next occasion.
Comment 3 Owen Taylor 2002-03-20 20:45:02 UTC 
Moving docs bugs from 2.0.1 => 2.0.2
Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2002-04-05 13:33:07 UTC 
Move open bugs from milestones 2.0.[012] -- > 2.0.3, since 2.0.2 is already out.
Comment 5 Matthias Clasen 2002-04-22 09:08:05 UTC 
Owen, can you enlighten me when deprecations will next be allowed ?
2.2, 2.4, 3.0 ?
Comment 6 Owen Taylor 2002-04-22 19:21:10 UTC 
I think it probably makes the most sense to add more
deprecations in 2.4. In theory, they should be OK for 2.2,
but since I think the 2.2 rollout is going to be a bit 
messy, they could cause some problems for people compiling
with G_DISABLE_DEPRECATIONS.
Comment 7 Matthias Clasen 2002-04-23 11:08:15 UTC 
Should we have a target milestone for 2.4, or do you consider
anything beyond 2.2 to 
be "future" ?
Comment 8 Owen Taylor 2002-04-23 16:59:11 UTC 
Well, now that we have some roadmap for 2.x, it probably makes
sense to add a 2.4 milestone for thing we know are 2.4.