After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 687658 - notifications lie
notifications lie
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-shell
Classification: Core
Component: message-tray
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-shell-maint
gnome-shell-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-11-05 15:34 UTC by William Jon McCann
Modified: 2013-08-05 19:55 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
screenshot (491.08 KB, image/png)
2012-11-05 15:36 UTC, William Jon McCann
Details

Description William Jon McCann 2012-11-05 15:34:42 UTC
When I user switch to another account I'm regularly confronted with a stream of notifications that are lies. I have to click through many network disconnected messages and low power warnings. These were probably generated while the other user account was active.

Firstly, the notifications probably shouldn't be generated in an inactive user session. Secondly, the notifications should be removed or recalled when the condition is no longer present. Thirdly, both network and power notifications should always replace the existing notification and not add a new one. So, at most I should have one lie each.
Comment 1 William Jon McCann 2012-11-05 15:36:05 UTC
Created attachment 228131 [details]
screenshot
Comment 2 Florian Müllner 2012-11-05 17:11:23 UTC
Hey, don't shoot the messenger :-)

None of those notifications is actually ours (the power one is from g-s-d, no idea about the disconnected network - do you have nm-applet running?).

If we want to, we can ignore all notifications while an account is inactive - not sure we should, as I think that some notifications are still useful when you come back (chat, email, ...).

Replacing existing notifications is entirely up to the emitter.
Comment 3 Allan Day 2012-11-07 09:15:29 UTC
I've filed bug 687828 against g-s-d and bug 687829 against NetworkManager.
Comment 4 Jasper St. Pierre (not reading bugmail) 2013-08-05 19:55:46 UTC
Given how the two components have been fixed, I think this is fixed as well. Feel free to reopen if this isn't the case.