After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 686624 - The 2010-2011 annual report is missing
The 2010-2011 annual report is missing
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: website
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: foundation.gnome.org
current
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Foundation website maintainer(s)
Foundation website maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-10-22 11:24 UTC by Alexandre Franke
Modified: 2013-03-05 14:55 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Alexandre Franke 2012-10-22 11:24:15 UTC
http://www.gnome.org/foundation/reports/ lacks a link to the 2010-2011 annual report.
Comment 1 Andreas Nilsson 2012-10-22 11:27:25 UTC
We need to do some edits to the pdf's before we can publish the web version.
Comment 2 Andreas Nilsson 2012-11-23 15:41:15 UTC
There, now all the Friends of GNOME donors are filled in.
Check if this looks good enough to publish.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/184285/annual-report-web.pdf
Comment 3 Alexandre Franke 2012-11-23 15:54:41 UTC
Looks good to me.
Comment 4 Tobias Mueller 2012-11-23 16:16:40 UTC
Nice! Good work!

Bonus points, if we can make it GNOME.Asia Summit, not "GNOME.Asia", when referred to the annual Event to not confuse that with the Asian GNOME communities.

I would right align the numbers in the Attendees column on page 10.

And probably reformat the dates there. But I don't know if get's more readable. I would experiment with, i.e. 2012-10-09 - 2012-10-13, but that's probably too long. But an indication to the year of the event would be nice. Maybe a sub table with a "2010" headline or so. But it's fine enough the way it is. So if that's too much work, then I wouldn't work it on.

On page 12 there is "The hackfest in 2010-2011", I would probably make it "The hackfests in 2010 and 2011 ...".

Page 14 has "GNOME Outreach Program, May - August 2011". If it fits, I'd make it "GNOME Outreach Program for Women, May - August 2011" to keep the "brand" of GOPW.

Btw, I can't select text in Evince.. O_o very annoying. Hm. No. I can, but it is very slow. *wondering*

"Nine interns from the first two rounds attended the Desktop Summit in Berlin, Germany in August some doing lightning talks during the GNOME & KDE Interns Showcase, and attending the GNOME Women's Dinner there (which grew to 23 attendees!)." that's a bit odd to read, I find. Maybe: "Nine interns from the first two rounds attended the Desktop Summit in Berlin, Germany in August. Some of them did a lightning talk during the GNOME & KDE Interns Showcase, and attended the GNOME Women's Dinner (which grew to 23 attendees!)."



Page 18: "2010 was the first year in which women participated through GNOME in Google Summer of Code, accepting two women that year." Hm. I also find that hard to read. Maybe: "2010 was the first year for women to participate to GNOME through Google's Summer of Code. Two women were accepted that year.".



Typo on Page 20: Beijin

Page 21: I would right align the numbers. And put USD somewhere.

Double check whether it's "Incomes" or "Income".

I would try to align the "Total" row in each table to be on the same horizontal level.

Page 22: I don't how we feel about it, but we may change "The Advisory Board consists of representatives from the following GNOME Foundation member corporations and projects:" to reflect that the list represents the Adboard in 2010/2011.
Comment 5 Juanjo Marín 2012-11-24 00:34:23 UTC
I miss the license information of the pictures
Comment 6 Andreas Nilsson 2012-11-24 14:37:26 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)

Note that I set a deadline on Today for this. Perfect is the enemy of good and I feel ashamed that it took us this long to get this out, so lets put quality as a goal for next report and kick this out of the door. Some of the issues below are fixed, some are not.


> Nice! Good work!

I hate this report with a passion now. :)


> 
> Bonus points, if we can make it GNOME.Asia Summit, not "GNOME.Asia", when
> referred to the annual Event to not confuse that with the Asian GNOME
> communities.

I too stressed to find all these.


> I would right align the numbers in the Attendees column on page 10.

Didn't look good. Not fixed.


> And probably reformat the dates there. But I don't know if get's more readable.
> I would experiment with, i.e. 2012-10-09 - 2012-10-13, but that's probably too
> long. But an indication to the year of the event would be nice. Maybe a sub
> table with a "2010" headline or so. But it's fine enough the way it is. So if
> that's too much work, then I wouldn't work it on.

No time for experiments.


> On page 12 there is "The hackfest in 2010-2011", I would probably make it "The
> hackfests in 2010 and 2011 ...".

Fixed.

 
> Page 14 has "GNOME Outreach Program, May - August 2011". If it fits, I'd make
> it "GNOME Outreach Program for Women, May - August 2011" to keep the "brand" of GOPW.

Fixed.


> "Nine interns from the first two rounds attended the Desktop Summit in Berlin,
> Germany in August some doing lightning talks during the GNOME & KDE Interns
> Showcase, and attending the GNOME Women's Dinner there (which grew to 23
> attendees!)." that's a bit odd to read, I find. Maybe: "Nine interns from the
> first two rounds attended the Desktop Summit in Berlin, Germany in August. Some
> of them did a lightning talk during the GNOME & KDE Interns Showcase, and
> attended the GNOME Women's Dinner (which grew to 23 attendees!)."

Fixed.


> Page 18: "2010 was the first year in which women participated through GNOME in
> Google Summer of Code, accepting two women that year." Hm. I also find that
> hard to read. Maybe: "2010 was the first year for women to participate to GNOME through Google's Summer of Code. Two women were accepted that year.".

Fixed.


> Typo on Page 20: Beijin

Fixed.
 
> Page 21: I would right align the numbers. And put USD somewhere.

Put it at the beginning, so Fixed.


> Page 22: I don't how we feel about it, but we may change "The Advisory Board
> consists of representatives from the following GNOME Foundation member
> corporations and projects:" to reflect that the list represents the Adboard in
> 2010/2011.

No replacement suggested. Not fixed.
Comment 7 Andreas Nilsson 2012-11-24 17:13:11 UTC
Latest version, with the photo credits Juanjo provided:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/184285/annual-report-web.pdf
Comment 8 Alexandre Franke 2013-03-05 14:55:08 UTC
The document has been put online and linked to from http://www.gnome.org/foundation/reports/ so this seems fixed.