After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 686315 - .egg-info files get installed into wrong python top level directory
.egg-info files get installed into wrong python top level directory
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: pygobject
Classification: Bindings
Component: general
3.4.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this now (help wanted and appreciated)
Python bindings maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-10-17 16:32 UTC by Kalev Lember
Modified: 2012-10-17 19:08 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Install the .egg-info files into correct multilib directory (1.22 KB, patch)
2012-10-17 16:34 UTC, Kalev Lember 		accepted-commit_now Details | Review

Description Kalev Lember 2012-10-17 16:32:46 UTC 
When building pygobject 3.4.1 on Fedora, the .py files end up in:
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gi/

but the .egg-info file gets installed in:
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pygobject-3.4.1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg-info

(note the lib64 vs lib)
Comment 1 Kalev Lember 2012-10-17 16:34:16 UTC 
Created attachment 226658 [details] [review]
Install the .egg-info files into correct multilib directory

This makes sure the .egg-info files end up in the same python top level
directory as the rest of the gi .py files.
Comment 2 Paolo Borelli 2012-10-17 17:03:08 UTC 
I have no clue about pyeggs, but it seems to make sense and pitti said to go ahead...

* pitti (~weechat@p549B2724.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #python
<pitti> pbor: oh, if you are going to roll a .1.1, perhaps you can include https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686315 ?
<pitti> pbor: need to run now, sorry
<pitti> pbor: and thanks!
* pitti has quit
Comment 3 Johan (not receiving bugmail) Dahlin 2012-10-17 19:08:58 UTC 
Review of attachment 226658 [details] [review]:

Thanks, I completely forgot that part. Looks good, please push.