Bug 679352 – /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-source-registry fails to start

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 679352 - /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-source-registry fails to start


Summary:	/usr/lib/evolution/evolution-source-registry fails to start


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 594473

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Shell
Version:	3.6.x (obsolete)
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	Normal normal
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:	evolution[account-mgmt]

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2012-07-03 21:12 UTC by Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Modified:	2013-09-13 01:07 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	---

Description Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre 2012-07-03 21:12:36 UTC

With Evolution/EDS 3.5.3.1; evolution sigtraps on startup because /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-source-registry fails to start (segfaults on startup), with the following messages:

Starting program: /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-source-registry 
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Migrating mail accounts from GConf...
Migrating addressbook sources from GConf...
Migrating calendar sources from GConf...
Migrating task list sources from GConf...
Migrating memo list sources from GConf...
[New Thread 0x7ffff0fd0700 (LWP 3374)]

(process:3346): libebackend-WARNING **: e_module_load_all_in_directory: Erreur à l'ouverture du répertoire « /usr/lib/evolution-data-server/registry-modules » : Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type

(process:3346): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot register existing type `EDBusObject'

(process:3346): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_interface_add_prerequisite: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_INTERFACE (interface_type)' failed

(process:3346): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_interface_add_prerequisite: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_INTERFACE (interface_type)' failed

(process:3346): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `result != 0' failed

(process:3346): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_param_spec_object: assertion `g_type_is_a (object_type, G_TYPE_OBJECT)' failed

(process:3346): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_class_install_property: assertion `G_IS_PARAM_SPEC (pspec)' failed

(process:3346): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: g_object_new_valist: object class `EServerSideSource' has no property named `dbus-object'

(process:3346): libebackend-CRITICAL **: server_side_source_set_server: assertion `E_IS_SOURCE_REGISTRY_SERVER (server)' failed

(process:3346): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_set: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed

(process:3346): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed


This is the resulting stack trace:

+ Trace 230465

#0 g_dbus_object_get_interface
at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.33.3/./gio/gdbusobject.c line 144
#1 e_dbus_object_get_source
at e-dbus-source.c line 3180
#2 e_server_side_source_load
at e-server-side-source.c line 1238
#3 server_side_source_initable_init
at e-server-side-source.c line 816
#4 g_initable_new_valist
at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.33.3/./gio/ginitable.c line 228
#5 g_initable_new
at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.33.3/./gio/ginitable.c line 148
#6 e_server_side_source_new
at e-server-side-source.c line 1106
#7 e_source_registry_server_load_file
at e-source-registry-server.c line 1599
#8 e_source_registry_server_load_directory
at e-source-registry-server.c line 1511
#9 e_source_registry_server_load_all
at e-source-registry-server.c line 1420
#10 main
at evolution-source-registry.c line 56

Comment 1 Matthew Barnes 2012-07-04 00:04:00 UTC

Pretty much the same as bug 594473:

Remove -Bsymbolic-functions from the linker command.

I explained the details already on IRC.

Comment 2 Milan Crha 2012-09-07 13:01:07 UTC

Is this fixed by comment #1, please? This might be marked as a duplicate of bug #594473 then.

Comment 3 Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre 2012-09-07 13:12:03 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 594473 ***