After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 679101 - Lower animation duration
Lower animation duration
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-boxes
Classification: Applications
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: --
Assigned To: GNOME Boxes maintainer(s)
GNOME Boxes maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-06-29 07:42 UTC by Alexander Larsson
Modified: 2016-03-31 13:54 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Make animations slightly faster (1000 bytes, patch)
2012-09-24 14:26 UTC, Alexander Larsson 		committed Details | Review

Description Alexander Larsson 2012-06-29 07:42:10 UTC 
The current general animation duration in boxes is 250msec, While this makes the animations very obvious and nice it is imho slightly too long and makes you sometimes wait for the animations. I think something like 167msec (10 frames at 60hz) is a better value.
Comment 1 Jakub Steiner 2012-09-21 11:05:25 UTC 
You should not feel like you're waiting for transitions, indeed. I think it's a little too high right now. Now let's aim to really have the fluid 60fps :)
Comment 2 Christophe Fergeau 2012-09-24 08:44:48 UTC 
167ms looks good to me, but 250ms looked equally good too ;) Lets's get this in for 3.6.0!
Comment 3 Alexander Larsson 2012-09-24 14:26:03 UTC 
Created attachment 225066 [details] [review]
Make animations slightly faster

The current 250 msec is slighly to much and it sometimes feel as you
are waiting on animations. Bump the duration to a slightly lower
value that seems faster, but still lets you see the animations.
Comment 4 Christophe Fergeau 2012-09-24 14:58:55 UTC 
Review of attachment 225066 [details] [review]:

Dunno if this needs a freeze break, probably not, but asking doesn't hurt, especially as we need one for this display connection bug