After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 676981 - Fortran: Wrong type of argument in case of out of place !< comment
Fortran: Wrong type of argument in case of out of place !< comment
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Product: doxygen
Classification: Other
Component: general
1.8.1-SVN
Other Windows
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Dimitri van Heesch
Dimitri van Heesch
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-05-28 17:29 UTC by albert
Modified: 2012-07-22 11:12 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Patch: Ignore out of place comment (1.65 KB, patch)
2012-05-28 17:35 UTC, albert 		none Details | Review

Description albert 2012-05-28 17:29:05 UTC 
In case of an out of place comment of type !< and the fact that the name van an argument is inside the documentation of this out of place comment, the argument takes the type of the variable to which the out of place comment belongs.

Example:
========

SUBROUTINE A(ff)
  double precision :: ff
  integer          :: q  !< ff

END SUBROUTINE

results in the detailed description section in:
  subroutine a(integer ff)
instead of
  subroutine a(double precision ff)
Comment 1 albert 2012-05-28 17:35:48 UTC 
Created attachment 215138 [details] [review]
Patch: Ignore out of place comment

THis patch sees to it that the out of place comment !< is ignored and the arguments have their correct type.
Comment 2 Dimitri van Heesch 2012-06-17 17:23:37 UTC 
Thanks, I'll include the patch in the next subversion update.
Comment 3 Dimitri van Heesch 2012-07-12 15:41:52 UTC 
This bug was previously marked ASSIGNED, which means it should be fixed in
doxygen version 1.8.1.2. Please verify if this is indeed the case. Reopen the
bug if you think it is not fixed and please include any additional information
that you think can be relevant.
Comment 4 albert 2012-07-22 11:12:38 UTC 
Works as described