After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 674585 - inconsistencies between regular and bold
inconsistencies between regular and bold
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: cantarell-fonts
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Cantarell fonts maintainer(s)
Cantarell fonts maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-04-22 19:46 UTC by Teppo Turtiainen
Modified: 2012-04-23 13:32 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Teppo Turtiainen 2012-04-22 19:46:16 UTC 
Cantarell-Regular has a glyph called "interrobang" but in Cantarell-Bold this same glyph is called "uni203D".

Cantarell-Bold has a glyph called "uni022D" but there is no such glyph in Cantarell-Regular.
Comment 1 Jakub Steiner 2012-04-23 11:39:29 UTC 
Added the missing u022d glyph, but not sure about the glyph name inconsistency. FF shows U203D as being interrobang in Regular and Bold.
Comment 2 Teppo Turtiainen 2012-04-23 13:32:44 UTC 
It's just the internal glyph name that is different. You can see the difference with:

diff <(otfinfo -g Cantarell-Regular.otf | sort) <(otfinfo -g Cantarell-Bold.otf | sort)