After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 673061 - Not configurable screencasting shortcut
Not configurable screencasting shortcut
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: gnome-shell
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-shell-maint
gnome-shell-maint
Depends on: 673059
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-03-29 11:30 UTC by Bastien Nocera
Modified: 2012-10-24 20:08 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Bastien Nocera 2012-03-29 11:30:07 UTC
gnome-shell needs to offer the functionality over dbus, instead of hard-coding it within.

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #673059 +++

It is possible to configure shortcuts for taking screenshots, but impossible to configure the shortcut for recording a screencast. That sounds like inconsistency to me.
Comment 1 Florian Müllner 2012-03-29 12:20:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> gnome-shell needs to offer the functionality over dbus, instead of hard-coding
> it within.

I'm not sure I agree - the shortcut itself is already configurable, we just don't expose it to control-center. Is there any particular value in having it work analogous to gnome-screenshot from a user perspective? And more importantly - who is supposed to consume the DBus API?

Also see bug 671010
Comment 2 Bastien Nocera 2012-03-29 12:30:31 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > gnome-shell needs to offer the functionality over dbus, instead of hard-coding
> > it within.
> 
> I'm not sure I agree - the shortcut itself is already configurable, we just
> don't expose it to control-center. Is there any particular value in having it
> work analogous to gnome-screenshot from a user perspective?

We need to figure out whether it's an end-user feature or not. If not, then I'm fine with the current state of affairs. If it is, it would be nicer if it were handled like screenshots, and other global shortcuts.

> And more
> importantly - who is supposed to consume the DBus API?

gnome-settings-daemon would call it out.
Comment 3 Alexandre Prokoudine 2012-03-29 12:39:40 UTC
I'm not sure what's the process of figuring this out :), I'm just passing you what end-users think is missing and what I myself confirm as lacking a consistent approach. You could take it as an opinionated piece of crap or you could take it as a call for common sense :)
Comment 4 Florian Müllner 2012-10-24 20:08:25 UTC
I don't think it really matters to users where a particular feature is implemented; the shortcut itself is now configurable in control-center.