After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 672938 - Switch to Ctrl-Shift-J makes "Fit in Window" a two-handed operation
Switch to Ctrl-Shift-J makes "Fit in Window" a two-handed operation
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: GIMP
Classification: Other
Component: User Interface
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: GIMP Bugs
GIMP Bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-03-27 16:30 UTC by Matthew Miller
Modified: 2012-04-15 03:23 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Matthew Miller 2012-03-27 16:30:56 UTC
Switching between 1:1 pixel-view and fit in window is a frequent operation for me as I do photo retouching. Switching to 1:1 is easy and mnemonic, with the 1 key. With 2.6, going to fit-in-window view was a kind of weird key combo (ctrl-shift-e), but I could easily accomplish it with my left hand with my right hand still on the mouse.

With 2.7, the new shortcut is ctrl-shift-j — way over on the other side of the keyboard. That's quite the stretch! For my own system, I've changed this to shift-1 (that is, !), which doesn't appear to be taken. Any chance of making that the default?

(I don't really care which color the shed ends up being, but I would like it to be a quick, single-handed shed.)
Comment 1 Matthew Miller 2012-03-27 16:35:31 UTC
Alternately, Inkscape uses the number keys as zoom shortcuts like this:

1: Zoom 1:1
2: Zoom 1:2 
3: Fit selection to window
4: Fit drawing to window (in inkscape, the drawing can go outside the image size)
5: Fit page to window
6: Fit page width to window (roughly like fill window in gimp)

I realize that the multiple pixel levels are more useful in Gimp than Inkscape, but having greater UI correspondence between the two tools would be a feature in itself.
Comment 2 Michael Natterer 2012-04-14 08:50:11 UTC
Sorry, we can't satisfy everybody's favorite "one hand shortcut" needs,
and this will definitely not change for 2.8. Please discuss it on the
mailing list, but I'm really reluctant to repeatedly change shortcuts.
Comment 3 Matthew Miller 2012-04-15 03:23:05 UTC
That's a reasonable reluctance; it seems like it's important to make any changes before the final 2.8 release.

In this case, the suggested shift-1 isn't used by anything else, and so seems a natural choice. I'll bring this up on the mailing list.