After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 669889 - nautilus-file-undo-operations.c misses ngettext / proper plural forms
nautilus-file-undo-operations.c misses ngettext / proper plural forms
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Internationalization (i18n)
0.x.x [obsolete]
Other All
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 670157 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-02-11 14:56 UTC by Yuri Myasoedov
Modified: 2012-02-15 18:43 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 3.3/3.4



Description Yuri Myasoedov 2012-02-11 14:56:21 UTC
Please, use plural forms for these messages:

* Move %d items back to '%s'
* Delete %d copied items
* _Undo Copy %d items
* _Redo Copy %d items
* Move %d items to '%s'
* Move %d items back to trash
* Restore %d items from trash
* Copy %d items to '%s'
* Delete %d duplicated items
* Duplicate of %d items in '%s'
* _Undo Duplicate %d items
* _Redo Duplicate %d items
* Delete links to %d items
* Create links to %d items
* Move %d items to trash
Comment 1 André Klapper 2012-02-11 17:52:10 UTC
This is about ../libnautilus-private/nautilus-file-undo-operations.c

Yuri: Please always include info for developers HOW to fix it. In this case:
https://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject/DevGuidelines/Plurals
Comment 2 Yuri Myasoedov 2012-02-11 18:05:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is about ../libnautilus-private/nautilus-file-undo-operations.c
> 
> Yuri: Please always include info for developers HOW to fix it. In this case:
> https://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject/DevGuidelines/Plurals

Ok, thanks for pointing.
Comment 3 Cosimo Cecchi 2012-02-14 20:05:13 UTC
Thanks for the report and the link. I now pushed a fix to git master.
Comment 4 Cosimo Cecchi 2012-02-15 18:43:55 UTC
*** Bug 670157 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***