After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 668659 - Would be nice to know if g_hash_table_replace() actually replaced
Would be nice to know if g_hash_table_replace() actually replaced
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 697828
Product: glib
Classification: Platform
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gtkdev
gtkdev
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-01-25 12:51 UTC by Rob Staudinger
Modified: 2013-08-17 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Rob Staudinger 2012-01-25 12:51:01 UTC 
Sometimes it's nice to know whether g_hash_table_replace() did just insert, or actually replace. Would a boolean return value to tell just that be worth some consideration?
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2013-08-17 21:47:18 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 697828 ***