After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 668606 - gobject-introspection repository for gupnp-dlna conflicts with gupnp
gobject-introspection repository for gupnp-dlna conflicts with gupnp
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gupnp-dlna
Classification: Other
Component: General
0.6.x
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: GUPnP Maintainers
GUPnP Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-01-24 19:17 UTC by Roman Kagan
Modified: 2019-02-22 06:00 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
[PATCH] Define proper g-i namespace (1.07 KB, patch)
2012-01-24 19:17 UTC, Roman Kagan
none Details | Review
Change gir namespace (914 bytes, patch)
2012-01-24 22:44 UTC, Jens Georg
none Details | Review
Whoops, sorry, didn't notice your patch, but it has the same problem as mine: (1.95 KB, patch)
2012-01-24 23:59 UTC, Jens Georg
committed Details | Review

Description Roman Kagan 2012-01-24 19:17:23 UTC
Created attachment 206007 [details] [review]
[PATCH] Define proper g-i namespace

gupnp-dlna library defines introspection namespace "GUPnP" -- the same as gupnp library.

As a result only one of the two typelibs are visible.
Comment 1 Jens Georg 2012-01-24 22:44:40 UTC
Created attachment 206037 [details] [review]
Change gir namespace

Thought introspection can handle that. Rename Namespace to GUPnPDLNA, similar to GUPnPAV
Comment 2 Jens Georg 2012-01-24 23:59:36 UTC
Created attachment 206045 [details] [review]
Whoops, sorry, didn't notice your patch, but it has the same problem as mine:

GUPnP-DLNA-1.0.gir:20:1: error: <namespace/> name element 'GUPnPDLNA' doesn't match file name 'GUPnP'
error parsing file GUPnP-DLNA-1.0.gir: <namespace/> name element 'GUPnPDLNA' doesn't match file name 'GUPnP'

Anyway, also updated some prefixes as GUPnPDLNA.DLNADiscoverer just looks bad.
Comment 3 Zeeshan Ali 2012-01-25 00:50:52 UTC
Review of attachment 206045 [details] [review]:

Looks correct!
Comment 4 Jens Georg 2012-02-13 08:14:18 UTC
This problem has been fixed in our software repository. The fix will go into the next software release. Thank you for your bug report.