GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 666378
minor license inconsistencies
Last modified: 2019-02-22 11:59:25 UTC
Pointed out in the Fedora package review: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license gcr/icons/render-icons.py is LGPLv3 / CC-BY-SA 3.0 gcr/gcr-menu-button.c is GPLv2 gcr/gcr-collection-model.c is GPLv2 gcr/gcr-collection-model.h is GPLv2 gck/pkcs11n.h is MPLv1.1 while COPYING is LGPLv2+
That is in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753016 btw
(In reply to comment #0) > Pointed out in the Fedora package review: > > MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license > > gcr/icons/render-icons.py is LGPLv3 / CC-BY-SA 3.0 This is not built or linked into any binary, but is a tool used when working with the icons. It is not used in the build either. > gcr/gcr-menu-button.c is GPLv2 Ah good catch. Removed, as the work which was to use this didn't get completed. When this is done correctly will make sure to build an LGPLv2 implementation. > gcr/gcr-collection-model.c is GPLv2 > gcr/gcr-collection-model.h is GPLv2 These were written by me. I've relicensed them. > gck/pkcs11n.h is MPLv1.1 This file (which comes from mozilla) states: * Alternatively, the contents of this file may be used under the terms of * either the GNU General Public License Version 2 or later (the "GPL"), or * the GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 or later (the "LGPL"), So it shouldn't be a problem.