After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 665072 - g_thread_init is gone in glib 2.31 (obsolete since glib 2.24)
g_thread_init is gone in glib 2.31 (obsolete since glib 2.24)
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: Evolution Webcal
Classification: Deprecated
Component: General
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Rodney Dawes
Rodney Dawes
gnome[unmaintained]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2011-11-28 18:20 UTC by Dominique Leuenberger
Modified: 2014-08-30 00:06 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Remove usage of g_thread_init (721 bytes, patch)
2011-11-28 18:25 UTC, Dominique Leuenberger 		none Details | Review

Description Dominique Leuenberger 2011-11-28 18:20:48 UTC 
Building evo-webcal fails with glib 2.31, asa g_thread_init has been deprecated.
Comment 1 Dominique Leuenberger 2011-11-28 18:25:14 UTC 
Created attachment 202317 [details] [review]
Remove usage of g_thread_init

Probably we need to bump the minimum required version of glib to >= 2.24, as since then g_thread_init is no longer needed.

OTOH: git master is targetting gtk3: so the dependencies in configura are likely 'wrong' anyway, that's why I did not address it in this patch.
Comment 2 Dominique Leuenberger 2012-08-21 22:11:30 UTC 
Is evo-webcal still alive? (At least there are still translation updates commited)

Patch is still applicable
Comment 3 André Klapper 2014-08-30 00:06:07 UTC 
evolution-webcal has not seen any code changes since May 2010:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/archive/evolution-webcal/log

This project is not under active development anymore and got recently archived
in GNOME Git.

Closing this report as WONTFIX as part of Bugzilla Housekeeping to reflect
reality. Please feel free to reopen this bug report in the future if anyone
takes the responsibility for active development again.