After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 664743 - Support OpenOCD debugging of remote targets
Support OpenOCD debugging of remote targets
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: nemiver
Classification: Other
Component: general
trunk
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Nemiver maintainers
Nemiver maintainers
gnome[unmaintained]
: 664721 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2011-11-24 16:30 UTC by Dodji Seketeli
Modified: 2020-03-10 11:55 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-24 16:30:37 UTC
Many people have requested that Nemiver supports remote debugging through OpenOCD[1] in addition to the normal support of gdbserver we already have.

This enhancement request is to track the progress of this feature.

[1]: http://openocd.sourceforge.net/doc/html/GDB-and-OpenOCD.html#GDB-and-OpenOCD
Comment 1 Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-24 16:35:15 UTC
I have create this branch with an initial support for that feature: http://git.gnome.org/browse/nemiver/log/?h=remote-load-on-connect.

Basically, the file -> connect to remote target dialog now has a check box entitled "load inferior after connect".  Check that box before hitting the OK button and Nemiver should make the OpenOCD's gdbserver to issue a 'load' command upon connection.

There is also a --load-inferior-after-connect command line switch, in case you'd rather use the --remote command line switch.

I haven't tested this, so if someone has an OpenOCD setup, please let me know if it works.
Comment 2 Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-24 20:08:15 UTC
*** Bug 664721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 André Klapper 2020-03-10 11:55:41 UTC
Closing all open Nemiver tasks as this project does not seem to be maintained anymore. Please see https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/235#note_732192 for further information. Thanks!