After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 664657 - S/MIME signature unvalid
S/MIME signature unvalid
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
3.0.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2011-11-23 18:06 UTC by Paul Menzel
Modified: 2012-09-20 19:04 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Paul Menzel 2011-11-23 18:06:30 UTC
The attached message [1] is signed but the signature is marked as invalid.

I found the following fields.

        Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha1"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-lYAU0MbfCPO/lYiSvhhG"

        Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"

Can you tell me why, please? Is that an Evolution limitation or is was
the message signed incorrectly?

PS: I reported this to the list evolution-list [2] but was told to file a new bug here.

[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2011-November/013603.html
[2] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2011-November/thread.html
Comment 1 Milan Crha 2012-03-09 13:30:53 UTC
Thanks for a bug report. The exact message thread for that yours is [3], where you also added the exact message as an attachment (the archives of intel-gfx breaks message in the .gz format, thus they became unusable with respect of S/MIME signing).

I see from the thread [3] that we found the issue later in it, your evolution didn't have updated CaCert root certificate, while the system database does have it updated. I also pointer you to bug #585301.

I do not think there lefts anything to investigate. What do you think?

[1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2011-November/msg00100.html
Comment 2 André Klapper 2012-06-27 10:43:04 UTC
Paul: Can you answer comment 1?
Comment 3 André Klapper 2012-09-20 19:04:15 UTC
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for.
Thanks!