GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 660870
Empty Contacts list when pressing "To:" button in mail composer
Last modified: 2013-08-24 15:20:16 UTC
When composing new message, click To: button. It used to display all my contacts (I don't have many) and selecting addressee was easy. Since version 3.2.0 the list is empty and I have to start typing something in the Search field to get relevant addresses listed. This is not convenient in my case. I would like to be able to switch to the old behaviour somehow. Please, advise what I can do to get all my addresses listed when I press To: button from Compose message screen. Thank you
Please check which address books are activated and which ones the dialog is set to use.
Thank you for response, André. I checked just now -- there is only one address book called Personal. In it's properties all three boxes are ticked, including Mark as default. See screenshot: http://tinypic.com/r/34ozds9/7 In Compose message address selection dialogue I have the same address book selected, but no addresses are listed unless I start typing in Search field. See screenshot here: http://tinypic.com/r/96huza/7
Created attachment 199643 [details] [review] eds patch for evolution-data-server; This fixes it. Any book backend using the SQLiteDB cache was affected. The cache transformed the query into an invalid SQL statement, and thus the result was no uid, thus an empty list of contacts.
Created commit 7f26baf in eds master (3.3.1+) Created commit ee4574f in eds gnome-3-2 (3.2.2+)
Thank you for your efforts! Will wait when this solution flows down to my distribution.
The problem is there again in evolution 3.6.0 (from Ubuntu Quantal). I mean: the symptoms are exactly the same, though I have no idea about the reason. Could someone please confirm and reopen?
By the way: the (new) launchpad bug is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1072442 So considering as confirmed
Testing with the most recent bugfix version first (3.6.2) is welcome.
Right, I bet 3.6.2 or the upcoming 3.6.3 will have this fixed, I recall something similar, but not the exact change for it.