After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 659795 - desktop file needs GenericName entries
desktop file needs GenericName entries
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 614947
Product: dia
Classification: Other
Component: general
0.97.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Dia maintainers
Dia maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2011-09-22 07:44 UTC by Roland Stigge
Modified: 2012-08-10 19:02 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Forwarded diff by Debian contributor (3.50 KB, patch)
2011-09-22 07:44 UTC, Roland Stigge 		none Details | Review
Add GenericName to desktop file (246 bytes, patch)
2011-12-29 23:12 UTC, Roland Stigge 		none Details | Review

Description Roland Stigge 2011-09-22 07:44:52 UTC 
Created attachment 197215 [details] [review]
Forwarded diff by Debian contributor

Hi,

at Debian, we got an update to the desktop file. Unfortunately, the patch (including updated translations) applies to the installed desktop file, not the dia.desktop.in.in source.

Nevertheless, please consider:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641709

Thanks!

bye,
  Roland
Comment 1 Roland Stigge 2011-12-29 23:12:40 UTC 
Created attachment 204332 [details] [review]
Add GenericName to desktop file

This patch actually applies to the dia sources and adds GenericName (or better: Name/GenericName differentiation) support to dia.desktop.in.in as required by freedesktop.org standards.
Comment 2 Hans Breuer 2012-08-10 08:05:12 UTC 
But it has according to bug 614947. What am I missing here?
Comment 3 Roland Stigge 2012-08-10 08:52:37 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> But it has according to bug 614947. What am I missing here?

While I can confirm that I can find the respective fix in the git repo, I wonder why it has been applied on 2010-07-15 but in latest dia 0.97.2 from 2011-12-18, it's not present? I.e. even 1.5 years after the fix applied, it didn't find its way into the release done then.
Comment 4 Hans Breuer 2012-08-10 19:02:05 UTC 
That's because not everything got merged to the branch. IIRC my review of bugs to backport was based on priorities and maybe even correctly set target milestone.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 614947 ***